Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
![Loading indicator](/images/ajax-loader-bar.gif)
Developed Nations have been permitted to extend preferential treatment to Developing Countries through a Generalized System of Preferences (GSP). The GSP however, has encouraged discrimination amongst Developing Countries. India in 2002, made a formal complaint to the World Trade Organization (WTO) that discrimination was particularly prominent in certain aspects of the GSP scheme of the European Community. Since the decision of the Appellate Body in April 2004, many questions have been raised as to what extent can, and should donors, discriminate amongst recipients. This paper revisits the GSP schemes of the European Community and the United States of America and explores the tensions caused by their unilateral and discretionary nature. It also highlights the path that needs to be taken so that conditionality and reciprocity is tempered and a balance is struck between an enhanced cooperation policy of Developed Countries, and the promotion of growth and development of Developing Countries.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
![Loading indicator](/images/ajax-loader-bar.gif)
Showing 1 featured edition. View all 1 editions?
Edition | Availability |
---|---|
1
Donor discrimination in the GSP: Towards an acceptable balance for development.
2006
in English
0494212470 9780494212479
|
aaaa
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 45-03, page: 1285.
Thesis (LL.M.)--University of Toronto, 2006.
Electronic version licensed for access by U. of T. users.
ROBARTS MICROTEXT copy on microfiche.
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?History
- Created October 22, 2008
- 3 revisions
Wikipedia citation
×CloseCopy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?
April 26, 2011 | Edited by OCLC Bot | Added OCLC numbers. |
December 15, 2009 | Edited by WorkBot | link works |
October 22, 2008 | Created by ImportBot | Imported from University of Toronto MARC record |