A comparative case study of the Parliamentary budget process in Pakistan, India and Canada.

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
A comparative case study of the Parliamentary ...
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
December 26, 2022 | History

A comparative case study of the Parliamentary budget process in Pakistan, India and Canada.

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date
Language
English
Pages
11

Buy this book

Edition Availability
Cover of: A comparative case study of the Parliamentary budget process in Pakistan, India and Canada.
A comparative case study of the Parliamentary budget process in Pakistan, India and Canada.
2005, Pakistan Institute of Legislative Development and Transparency
in English

Add another edition?

Book Details


Edition Notes

Cover title.

Includes bibliographical references (p. 11).

Published in
Islamabad
Series
Case study series
Other Titles
Parliamentary budget process in Pakistan, India and Canada

Classifications

Library of Congress
MLCM 2013/40446 (H), HJ2158.5 .C66 2005

The Physical Object

Pagination
11 p. ;
Number of pages
11

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL22672683M
ISBN 10
9695580068
LCCN
2008310943
OCLC/WorldCat
270232993

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
December 26, 2022 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
December 20, 2020 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
March 10, 2019 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
April 28, 2011 Edited by OCLC Bot Added OCLC numbers.
December 11, 2008 Created by ImportBot Imported from Library of Congress MARC record