Public expenditures and environmental protection
when is the cost of funds irrelevant?
by Gunnar S. Eskeland
- 0 Ratings
- 0 Want to read
- 0 Currently reading
- 0 Have read
Pigou's conjecture was that under costly taxation public expenditures should not reach the point where marginal benefits equal marginal costs. In the treatment here, public expenditures (and environmental protection) may provide public goods for consumption but also collective inputs for production. When the benefits are in production, the cost of funds is irrelevant. Why? Collective inputs benefit goods that are taxed, while for public goods the shadow price of funds reduces provision as if they were.
Buy this book
Showing 1 featured edition. View all 1 editions?
| Edition | Availability |
|---|---|
1
Public expenditures and environmental protection: when is the cost of funds irrelevant?
2000, World Bank, Development Research Group, Public Economics
Electronic resource
in English
|
aaaa
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
Also available in print.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 26-27).
Title from title screen as viewed on Sept. 30, 2002.
"December 2000"--Cover.
Moce of access: World Wide Web.
Classifications
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?
History
- Created April 1, 2008
- 6 revisions
Wikipedia citation
×CloseCopy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?
| December 7, 2020 | Edited by MARC Bot | import existing book |
| July 29, 2012 | Edited by VacuumBot | Updated format '[electronic resource] :' to 'Electronic resource' |
| December 14, 2009 | Edited by WorkBot | link works |
| December 14, 2009 | Edited by WorkBot | link works |
| April 1, 2008 | Created by an anonymous user | Imported from Scriblio MARC record |