An edition of The distinction between real and nominal Trinitarians examined, and the doctrine of a real Trinity vindicated from the charge of tritheism. In answer to a late Socinian pamphlet, entituled, The judgment of a disinterested person, concerning the controversie about the Blessed Trinity, depending between Dr. S—th, and Dr. Sherlock (2003)

The distinction between real and nominal Trinitarians examined, and the doctrine of a real Trinity vindicated from the charge of tritheism. In answer to a late Socinian pamphlet, entituled, The judgment of a disinterested person, concerning the controversie about the Blessed Trinity, depending between Dr. S—th, and Dr. Sherlock

by

The distinction between real and nominal Trin ...
William Sherlock, William Sher ...
Locate

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today
Notes
Notes

Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
November 30, 2023 | History
Edit
An edition of The distinction between real and nominal Trinitarians examined, and the doctrine of a real Trinity vindicated from the charge of tritheism. In answer to a late Socinian pamphlet, entituled, The judgment of a disinterested person, concerning the controversie about the Blessed Trinity, depending between Dr. S—th, and Dr. Sherlock (2003)

The distinction between real and nominal Trinitarians examined, and the doctrine of a real Trinity vindicated from the charge of tritheism. In answer to a late Socinian pamphlet, entituled, The judgment of a disinterested person, concerning the controversie about the Blessed Trinity, depending between Dr. S—th, and Dr. Sherlock

by

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date
Publisher
Alexander Street Press
Language
English
Pages
88

Buy this book

Edition Availability
Cover of: The distinction between real and nominal Trinitarians examined, and the doctrine of a real Trinity vindicated from the charge of tritheism. In answer to a late Socinian pamphlet, entituled, The judgment of a disinterested person, concerning the controversie about the Blessed Trinity, depending between Dr. S—th, and Dr. Sherlock
The distinction between real and nominal Trinitarians examined, and the doctrine of a real Trinity vindicated from the charge of tritheism. In answer to a late Socinian pamphlet, entituled, The judgment of a disinterested person, concerning the controversie about the Blessed Trinity, depending between Dr. S—th, and Dr. Sherlock
2003, Alexander Street Press
electronic resource / in English

Add another edition?

Book Details

Edition Notes

Title from title page.

Creation of electronic version: TechBooks. Creation of digital images: Oxford University Libraries. Conversion to TEI.2-conformant markup: TechBooks. Additional tagging: Alexander Street Press.

Includes both a digital facsimile of the original printed material and a searchable transcription.

Originally published: London: William Rogers, 1696.

The source for this digital reproduction can be found at: University of Oxford, Bodleian Library: 40 T 19(13) Jur.

Verification made against digital images of the printed text. Tagged to TEI in Libraries Level 4.

Mode of access: World Wide Web.

Published in
Alexandria, VA
Series
Digital Library of Classic Protestant Texts

The Physical Object

Format
[electronic resource] /
Pagination
88 p.
Number of pages
88

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL50193471M

Source records

harvard_bibliographic_metadata record

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
November 30, 2023 Created by MARC Bot Imported from harvard_bibliographic_metadata record