Rhetherford B. Martin, appellant, vs. George A. Chapman and John W. Littleford, appellees

Appeal from Board of Appeals. (Interference no. 60, 114) Brief for appellant. Hoguet & Neary, attorneys for appellant. Charles Neave, John F. Neary, George H. Corey, of counsel

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read
Rhetherford B. Martin, appellant, vs. George ...
Charles Neave
Not in Library

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
July 12, 2024 | History

Rhetherford B. Martin, appellant, vs. George A. Chapman and John W. Littleford, appellees

Appeal from Board of Appeals. (Interference no. 60, 114) Brief for appellant. Hoguet & Neary, attorneys for appellant. Charles Neave, John F. Neary, George H. Corey, of counsel

  • 0 Ratings
  • 0 Want to read
  • 0 Currently reading
  • 0 Have read

This edition doesn't have a description yet. Can you add one?

Publish Date
Publisher
Bar press
Language
English
Pages
25

Buy this book

Book Details


Edition Notes

Cover-title.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals. Patent appeal docket no. 3478.

Published in
New York]

The Physical Object

Pagination
ii, 25 pages
Number of pages
25

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL52362804M
OCLC/WorldCat
45128956

Source records

marc_columbia MARC record

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
July 12, 2024 Created by MARC Bot Imported from marc_columbia MARC record