Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Our paper provides a comparative perspective on the development of public primary education in four of the largest developing economies circa 1910: Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC). These four countries encompassed more than 50 percent of the world's population in 1910, but remarkably few of their citizens attended any school by the early 20th century. We present new, comparable data on school inputs and outputs for BRIC drawn from contemporary surveys and government documents. Recent studies emphasize the importance of political decentralization, and relatively broad political voice for the early spread of public primary education in developed economies. We identify the former and the lack of the latter to be important in the context of BRIC, but we also outline how other factors such as factor endowments, colonialism, serfdom, and, especially, the characteristics of the political and economic elite help explain the low achievement levels of these four countries and the incredible amount of heterogeneity within each of them.
Check nearby libraries
Buy this book
Edition | Availability |
---|---|
1
Big BRICs, weak foundations: the beginning of public elementary education in Brazil, Russia, India, and China
2011, Harvard Business School
in English
- Rev.
|
aaaa
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
2
Big BRICs, weak foundations: the beginning of public elementary education in Brazil, Russia, India, and China, 1880-1930 ?
2011, Harvard Business School
in English
|
zzzz
Libraries near you:
WorldCat
|
Book Details
Edition Notes
"February 2011, revised July 2011" -- Publisher's website.
Includes bibliographical references.
The Physical Object
ID Numbers
Work Description
Our paper provides a comparative perspective on the development of public primary education in four of the largest developing economies circa 1910, BRIC - Brazil, Russia, India and China. These four countries encompassed almost 50 percent of the world's population in 1910, but remarkably few of their citizens attended any school in the early 20th century. We present new, comparable data on school inputs and outputs for BRIC that are drawn from a variety of archival and published sources. Similar to recent studies that emphasize the importance of income, political decentralization, and the level of political voice to the spread of primary education in developed economies, we also find these factors to be important in the context of BRIC. We also outline other factors such as local ethnic and religious heterogeneity, the institutional legacies of colonialism and serfdom, and, especially, the characteristics of the political and economic elite that help explain the low achievement levels of these countries and the incredible amount of heterogeneity within each BRIC.
Community Reviews (0)
Feedback?History
- Created August 16, 2024
- 1 revision
Wikipedia citation
×CloseCopy and paste this code into your Wikipedia page. Need help?
August 16, 2024 | Created by MARC Bot | Imported from harvard_bibliographic_metadata record |