An edition of Moral knowledge? (1996)

Moral Knowledge?

New Readings in Moral Epistemology

My Reading Lists:

Create a new list

Check-In

×Close
Add an optional check-in date. Check-in dates are used to track yearly reading goals.
Today


Buy this book

Last edited by MARC Bot
July 29, 2024 | History
An edition of Moral knowledge? (1996)

Moral Knowledge?

New Readings in Moral Epistemology

In Moral Knowledge? New Readings in Moral Epistemology, editors Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Mark Timmons bring together eleven newly written essays by distinguished moral philosophers exploring the nature and possibility of moral knowledge. Each essay represents a major position within the exciting field of moral epistemology in which a proponent of the position presents and defends his or her view and locates it vis a vis competing views.

The first chapter, written by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, provides a framework for understanding the basic concepts and viewpoints in moral epistemology and presents a limited skeptical challenge to the justification of moral beliefs. The following essays represent various options in response to moral skepticism. Peter Railton and Simon Blackburn take different stances on moral truth and realism. Robert Audi defends a version of intuitionism, and Geoffrey Sayre-McCord adopts coherentism, while R. M.

Hare combines elements of both foundationalism and coherentism. Richard Brandt discusses the relevance of empirical science to moral knowledge. Christopher Morris develops a contractarian account of moral justification, and David Copp bases moral knowledge on rational choices by societies. Margaret Urban Walker argues for a feminist perspective on moral knowledge, and Mark Timmons expounds contextualism in moral epistemology.

.

The lively and clear selections do not presuppose specialized knowledge of philosophy, and the philosophical vocabulary used throughout the anthology is uniform, in order to facilitate understanding by those not familiar with the field. The first chapter includes a sustained critical discussion of the major views represented in the following chapters, thereby furnishing beginning students with appropriate background to understand the selections.

The volume is further enhanced by an index and an extensive bibliography, which is divided into sections corresponding to the chapters of the book. Moral Knowledge? provides the most up to date work on moral knowledge and justification and serves as an excellent text for undergraduate and graduate courses.

Publish Date
Language
English
Pages
352

Buy this book

Previews available in: English

Edition Availability
Cover of: Moral Knowledge?
Moral Knowledge?: New Readings in Moral Epistemology
April 18, 1996, Oxford University Press, USA
in English

Add another edition?

Book Details


Classifications

Library of Congress
BJ1012.M633 1996, BJ1012 .M633 1996

ID Numbers

Open Library
OL7387474M
Internet Archive
moralknowledgene0000unse
ISBN 10
019508988X
ISBN 13
9780195089882
LCCN
95044287
OCLC/WorldCat
33282199
Library Thing
958262
Goodreads
125298

Work Description

In Moral Knowledge? New Readings in Moral Epistemology, editors Walter Sinnott-Armstrong and Mark Timmons bring together eleven newly written essays by distinguished moral philosophers exploring the nature and possibility of moral knowledge. Each essay represents a major position within the exciting field of moral epistemology in which a proponent of the position presents and defends his or her view and locates it vis a vis competing views.

The first chapter, written by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, provides a framework for understanding the basic concepts and viewpoints in moral epistemology and presents a limited skeptical challenge to the justification of moral beliefs. The following essays represent various options in response to moral skepticism. Peter Railton and Simon Blackburn take different stances on moral truth and realism. Robert Audi defends a version of intuitionism, and Geoffrey Sayre-McCord adopts coherentism, while R.M. Hare combines elements of both foundationalism and coherentism. Richard Brandt discusses the relevance of empirical science to moral knowledge. Christopher Morris develops a contractarian account of moral justification, and David Copp bases moral knowledge on rational choices by societies. Margaret Urban Walker argues for a feminist perspective on moral knowledge, and Mark Timmons expounds contextualism in moral epistemology.

The lively and clear selections do not presuppose specialized knowledge of philosophy, and the philosophical vocabulary used throughout the anthology is uniform, in order to facilitate understanding by those not familiar with the field. The first chapter includes a sustained critical discussion of the major views represented in the following chapters, thereby furnishing beginning students with appropriate background to understand the selections. The volume is further enhanced by an index and an extensive bibliography, which is divided into sections corresponding to the chapters of the book. Moral Knowledge? provides the most up to date work on moral knowledge and justification and serves as an excellent text for undergraduate and graduate courses.

Community Reviews (0)

Feedback?
No community reviews have been submitted for this work.

Lists

This work does not appear on any lists.

History

Download catalog record: RDF / JSON / OPDS | Wikipedia citation
July 29, 2024 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
May 9, 2021 Edited by ImportBot import existing book
March 3, 2021 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
November 20, 2020 Edited by MARC Bot import existing book
April 29, 2008 Created by an anonymous user Imported from amazon.com record