Record ID | harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.00.20150123.full.mrc:61505810:1801 |
Source | harvard_bibliographic_metadata |
Download Link | /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.00.20150123.full.mrc:61505810:1801?format=raw |
LEADER: 01801cam a2200313uu 4500
001 000099823-0
005 20111215123944.0
008 790809s1980 mau b 00110 eng
010 $a 79019859 //r82
020 $a0674196368
035 0 $aocm05333737
035 1 $aMAHL85B1419
040 $aDLC$cDLC
043 $an-us---
050 0 $aKF4575$b.E4
082 $a347/.73/12
100 1 $aEly, John Hart,$d1938-
245 10 $aDemocracy and distrust :$ba theory of judicial review /$cJohn Hart Ely.
260 0 $aCambridge :$bHarvard University Press,$c1980.
300 $aviii, 268 p. ;$c24 cm.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aThe allure of interpretivism -- The impossibility of a clause-bound interpretivism -- Discovering fundamental values -- Policing the process of representation: the court as referee -- Clearing the channels of political change -- Facilitating the representation of minorities.
520 $aUntil now legal experts have proposed two basic approaches to the Constitution. The first, "interpretivism," maintains that we should stick as closely as possible to what is explicit in the document itself. The second, predominant in recent academic theorizing, argues that the courts should be guided by what they see as the fundamental values of American society. Mr. Ely demonstrates that both of these approaches are inherently incomplete and inadequate. --from publisher description.
650 0 $aJudicial review$zUnited States.
700 1 $aCox, Archibald,$d1912-2004,$eformer owner.$5law
700 1 $aRawls, John,$d1921-2002,$eformer owner.$5hua
776 08 $iOnline version:$aEly, John Hart, 1938-$tDemocracy and distrust.$dCambridge : Harvard University Press, 1980$w(OCoLC)564800471
988 $a20020608
906 $0DLC