MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

LEADER: 03006pam a22003254a 4500
001 009236665-1
005 20040323104519.0
008 021204s2003 nju b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2002192489
020 $a0691096597 (alk. paper)
035 0 $aocm51178272
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dYDX
042 $apcc
043 $aa-ii---$aa-ko---
050 00 $aHD3616.I42$bC45 2003
082 00 $a338.0954/09/045$221
100 1 $aChibber, Vivek,$d1965-
245 10 $aLocked in place :$bstate-building and late industrialization in India /$cVivek Chibber.
260 $aPrinceton, N.J. :$bPrinceton University Press,$cc2003.
300 $axx, 334 p. ;$c24 cm.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [309]-326) and index.
505 0 $aPart I: The issues and the argument -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Late development and state-building -- Part II: Installing the state -- 3. The origins of the developmental state in Korea -- 4. Precursors to planning in India: the myth of the developmental bourgeoisie -- 5. The demobilization of the labor movement -- 6. The business offensive and the retreat of the state -- Part III: Reproducing the state -- 7. State structure and industrial policy -- 8. Locked in place: explaining the non-occurrence of reform -- 9. Conclusion -- The decline of development models.
520 1 $a"During the 1950s and 1960s, India launched an extremely ambitious and highly regarded program of state-led development. But it soon became clear that the Indian state lacked the institutional capacity to carry out rapid industrialization. Drawing on newly available archival sources, Vivek Chibber mounts a forceful challenge to conventional arguments by showing that the insufficient state capacity stemmed mainly from Indian industrialists' massive campaign, in the years after Independence, against a strong developmental state." "Chibber contrasts India's experience with the success of a similar program of state-building in South Korea, where political elites managed to harness domestic capitalists to their agenda. He then develops a theory of the structural conditions that can account for the different reactions of Indian and Korean capitalists as rational responses to the distinct development models adopted in each country." "This book is also the first historical study of India's post-colonial industrial strategy. Emphasizing the central role of capital in the state-building process, and restoring class analysis to the core of the political economy of development, Locked in Place is an innovative work of theoretical power that will interest development specialists, political scientists, and historians of the subcontinent."--Jacket.
650 0 $aIndustrial policy$zIndia$xHistory$y20th century.
650 0 $aIndustrialization$zIndia$xHistory$y20th century.
650 0 $aIndustrial policy$zKorea (South)$xHistory$y20th century.
651 0 $aIndia$xEconomic conditions$y20th century.
655 7 $aHistory.$2fast
988 $a20031114
906 $0DLC