MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

LEADER: 03199pam a2200361 a 45e0
001 009007856-X
005 20030321152242.0
008 020620s2003 cau b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2002009778
020 $a0804745935 (cloth : alk. paper)
035 0 $aocm50113904
040 $aDLC$cDLC
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF3775$b.S53 2003
082 00 $a344.73/046$221
100 1 $aShapiro, Sidney A.,$d1947-
245 10 $aRisk regulation at risk :$brestoring a pragmatic approach /$cSidney A. Shapiro, Robert L. Glicksman.
260 $aStanford, Calif. :$bStanford University Press,$cc2003.
300 $axii, 271 p. ;$c24 cm.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [215]-265) and index.
505 0 $aPragmatism and risk regulation -- Principles of pragmatic risk regulation -- The structure of risk regulation -- The rationale for risk regulation -- The critique of risk regulation -- Valuation methods -- Regulatory impact analysis requirements -- Pragmatic methods of regulation -- Promoting accountable risk regulation.
520 1 $a"In the 1960s and 1970s, Congress enacted a vast body of legislation to protect the environment and individual health and safety. Collectively, this legislation is known as "risk regulation" because it addresses the risk of harm that technology creates for individuals and the environment. In the last two decades, this legislation has come under increasing attack by critics who employ utilitarian philosophy and cost-benefit analysis. The defenders of this body of risk regulation, by contrast, have lacked a similar unifying theory."
520 8 $a"In this book, the authors propose that the American tradition of philosophical pragmatism fills this vacuum. They argue that pragmatism offers a better method for conceiving of and implementing risk regulation than the economic paradigm favored by its critics. While pragmatism offers a methodology in support of risk regulation as it was originally conceived, it also offers a perspective from which this legislation can be held up to critical appraisal. The authors employ pragmatism to support risk regulation, but pragmatism also leads them to agree with some of the criticisms against it and even to level new criticisms of their own."
520 8 $a"In the end, the authors reject the picture, painted by risk regulations' critics, of widely excessive and irrational regulation, but they do not entirely exonerate risk regulation either. The pragmatic perspective leads them to propose a number of ideas about how risk regulation might be usefully reformed."--Jacket.
650 0 $aEnvironmental law$zUnited States.
650 0 $aEnvironmental risk assessment$zUnited States.
650 0 $aTechnology$xRisk assessment$zUnited States.
650 0 $aRisk assessment$zUnited States.
700 1 $aGlicksman, Robert L.
776 08 $iOnline version:$aShapiro, Sidney A., 1947-$tRisk regulation at risk.$dStanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, ©2003$w(OCoLC)606935335
776 08 $iOnline version:$aShapiro, Sidney A., 1947-$tRisk regulation at risk.$dStanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, ©2003$w(OCoLC)607828517
988 $a20030312
906 $0DLC