It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

Record ID harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.11.20150123.full.mrc:47999938:2835
Source harvard_bibliographic_metadata
Download Link /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.11.20150123.full.mrc:47999938:2835?format=raw

LEADER: 02835cam a2200409 a 4500
001 011065848-5
005 20070910124536.0
008 871217s1989 cauaf b s001 0 eng
010 $a 87034933
015 $aGB91-55193
020 $a0520061403 (alk. paper)
020 $a9780520061408 (alk. paper)
020 $a0520075900 (pbk) :
020 $a9780520075900 (pbk)
035 0 $aocm17412328
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dUKM$dMLX$dBAKER$dNLGGC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP
043 $aa-cc-ti
050 0 $aDS786$b.G635 1989
082 0 $a951/.5$219
084 $a15.75$2bcl
100 1 $aGoldstein, Melvyn C.
245 12 $aA history of modern Tibet, 1913-1951 :$bthe demise of the Lamaist state /$cMelvyn C. Goldstein ; with the help of Gelek Rimpoche.
260 $aBerkeley :$bUniversity of California Press,$cc1989.
300 $axxv, 898 p., 11 p. of plates :$bill. ;$c24 cm.
504 $aBibliography: p. 845-854.
500 $aIncludes index.
505 2 $aThe era of the 13th Dalai Lama and Reting, 1913-1941 -- The era of Taktra and the 14th Dalai Lama, 1941-1951.
520 $a"The 'Tibetan Question,' the nature of Tibet's political status vis-a-vis China, has been the subject of often bitterly competing views while the facts of the issue have not been fully accessible to interested observers. While one faction has argued that Tibet was, in the main, historically independent until it was conquered by the Chinese Communists in 1951 and incorporated into the new Chinese state, the other faction views Tibet as a traditional part of China that split away at the instigation of the British after the fall of the Manchu Dynasty and was later dutifully reunited with "New China" in 1951. In contrast, this comprehensive study of modern Tibetan history presents a detailed, non-partisan account of the demise of the Lamaist state. Drawing on a wealth of British, American, and Indian diplomatic records; first- hand-historical accounts written by Tibetan participants; and extensive interviews with former Tibetan officials, monastic leaders, soldiers, and traders, Goldstein meticulously examines what happened and why. He balances the traditional focus on international relations with an innovative emphasis on the intricate web of internal affairs and events that produced the fall of Tibet. Scholars and students of Asian history will find this work an invaluable resource and interested readers will appreciate the clear explanation of highly polemicized, and often confusing, historical events." -- Publisher's description.
651 0 $aTibet Autonomous Region (China)$xHistory.
653 $aTibet (China)$aHistory, 1912-1965
650 17 $aLamaïsme.$2gtt
650 17 $aStaatsvorming.$2gtt
655 7 $aHistory.$2fast
700 1 $aRimpoche, Gelek.
988 $a20070910
049 $aHLSS
906 $0DLC