MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

LEADER: 01959nam a22003734a 4500
001 012087897-6
005 20100407145428.0
008 100309s2009 enk b 001 0 eng c
010 $a 2010286830
015 $aGBA950029$2bnb
016 7 $a015261804$2Uk
020 $a9781841132600 (cloth)
020 $a1841132608 (cloth)
035 0 $aocn303096486
040 $aUKM$cUKM$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dBWKUK$dBWX$dBWK$dUCDLL$dOWT$dILI$dCDX$dDLC
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---$ae-uk---$ab------
050 00 $aK2146$b.H364 2009
100 1 $aHammond, Grant.
245 10 $aJudicial recusal :$bprinciples, process and problems /$cGrant Hammond.
260 $aOxford ;$aPortland, Or. :$bHart Pub.,$c2009.
300 $axxiv, 183 p. ;$c24 cm.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [171]-179) and index.
505 0 $aThe essential questions -- The evolution of the present law in the common law world -- The classification of the present day recusal principles in the British Commonwealth -- Automatic disqualification in the British Commonwealth -- Apparent bias in the British Commonwealth -- Federal recusal law in the United States of America -- The importance of process -- Prudence : if in doubt, out? -- Practical rules and protocols -- Disclosure -- Waiver -- Necessity -- Appellate review of lower court decisions -- Recusal procedure in appellate courts -- Judicial misconduct in court : judges who go too far -- Prior viewpoints -- Unconscious bias -- Possible reforms -- Judges or legislators?
650 0 $aJudges$xRecusal.
650 0 $aJudges$xRecusal$zUnited States.
650 0 $aJudges$xRecusal$zGreat Britain.
650 0 $aJudges$xRecusal$zCommonwealth countries.
650 0 $aJudges$xDisqualification.
650 0 $aJudges$xDisqualification$zUnited States.
650 0 $aJudges$xDisqualification$zGreat Britain.
650 0 $aJudges$xDisqualification$zCommonwealth countries.
988 $a20090930
906 $0OCLC