It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

Record ID harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.12.20150123.full.mrc:38623834:3269
Source harvard_bibliographic_metadata
Download Link /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.12.20150123.full.mrc:38623834:3269?format=raw

LEADER: 03269cam a2200493Ia 4500
001 012030002-8
005 20090707104827.0
008 090624s2009 dcuab b f000 0 eng d
020 $a9780160831584
020 $a016083158X
035 0 $aocn407040826
040 $aOCO$cOCO$dISL
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aUG633.2$b.A77 2009
074 $a1005-C
086 0 $aY 10.2:AL 7/3
100 1 $aArthur, David$q(David Alan)
245 10 $aAlternatives for modernizing U.S. fighter forces /$c[David Arthur and Kevin Eveker].
260 $aWashington, D.C. :$bCongressional Budget Office :$bFor sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S. G.P.O.,$c[2009].
300 $axxii, 48 p. :$bill. (some col.), map ;$c29 cm.
490 1 $aCBO study
500 $a"May 2009."
500 $aAuthors taken from preface.
500 $aShipping list no.: 2009-0337-P.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 $aThe United States Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps have long maintained tactical fighter forces that provide capabilities for air-to-air combat and air-to-ground attack. The three services are in the process of replacing the bulk of today's fighter aircraft, most of which were purchased in the 1980s, with new F/A-18E/F, F-22, and F-35 (Joint Strike Fighter) aircraft. Although current procurement plans call for the purchase of about 2,500 aircraft over the next 25 years, the services are projecting that those purchases will not keep pace with the need to retire today's aircraft as they reach the limit of their service life. The study also compares the advantages, disadvantages, and costs of seven alternative approaches that DoD might adopt to modernize its fighter forces -- three that satisfy today's inventory requirements, two that maintain aggregate weapons capacity with fewer aircraft, and two that replace portions of the fighter force with longer-range aircraft. In keeping with CBO's mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, this study makes no recommendations.
505 0 $aThe Department of Defense's plans for modernizing fighter forces -- The capabilities of fighter forces under DOD's plans for modernization -- Alternatives to DOD's plans for modernizing fighter forces -- Details underlying CBO's cost analysis.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bAir Force$xProcurement.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bNavy$xProcurement.
610 10 $aUnited States.$bMarine Corps$xProcurement.
650 0 $aF/A-22 (Jet fighter plane)
650 0 $aF-35 (Jet fighter plane)
650 0 $aX-32 (Jet fighter plane)
650 0 $aFighter planes$zUnited States.
650 0 $aF-35 (Military aircraft)
650 0 $aF-22 (Jet fighter plane)
700 1 $aEveker, Kevin.
710 1 $aUnited States.$bCongressional Budget Office.
776 08 $iOnline version:$aArthur, David (David Alan).$tAlternatives for modernizing U.S. fighter forces.$h1 online resource (xxii, 48 p.)$z9780160831584$w(OCoLC)530155309
776 08 $iOnline version:$aArthur, David (David Alan).$tAlternatives for modernizing U.S. fighter forces.$dWashington, D.C. : Congressional Budget Office : For sale by the Supt. of Docs., U.S.G.P.O., [2009]$w(OCoLC)762537852
830 0 $aCBO study.
988 $a20090707
049 $aHLSS
906 $0OCLC