MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

LEADER: 03288cam a2200445Ia 4500
001 012565814-1
005 20100909104743.0
008 090913s2009 gw bm 001 0 enm d
020 $a9783525569139
020 $a3525569130
035 0 $aocn436407201
040 $aEMT$beng$cEMT$dNLGGC$dBWX$dYDXCP$dHEBIS$dDEBBG$dOCL
050 4 $aBX4827.C62$bL44 2009
100 1 $aLee, Brian J.
245 10 $aJohannes Cocceius and the exegetical roots of federal theology :$breformation developments in the interpretation of Hebrews 7-10 /$cBrian J. Lee.
260 $aGöttingen :$bVandenhoeck & Ruprecht,$c2009.
300 $a215 p. ;$c24 cm.
490 1 $aReformed historical theology ;$vvol. 7
502 $bdoctoral$cGrand Rapids, Mich., Calvin Theoligal Seminary$d2003
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [197]-209) and index.
505 0 $aIntroduction -- Part one : Covenant and exegesis. Exegesis and the development of covenant terminology -- The two Testaments in the Epistle to the Hebrews -- Part two : Cocceius's Epistolae ad Hebraeos Explicatio. The historical context of the Explilcatio -- Cocceius's arguments for abrogation in the Explicatio -- The theology of Cocceius in the Explicatio -- Conclusion -- Appendices. Authors and works cited in the Explicatio -- Chronological index of Cocceius's publications -- Table of contents of the Summa theologiae -- Table of contents of the Opera Omnia and Anecdota.
520 $aThe prominence of diatheke in the Epistle to the Hebrews made its interpretation crucial to the development of federal theology, and therefore Hebrews provides the natural starting point for an exegetical history of this topic. Since either producing merely a specimen of Hebrews exegesis or surverying broadly the exegesis in our period will raise more questions than it will answer, this project has been conceived in two parts. The first demonstrates the crucial role Hebrews exegesis played in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, providing necessary context. The second part explores in detail the Hebrews exegesis of a particular federal theologian, Johannes Cocceius (1603-1669), who is generally regarded as a high-water mark in the development of this doctrine. These two parts together demonstrate that exegesis was crucial in the development of federal theology, and therefore is a necessary and oft-neglected avenue to understanding this doctrine and its development. - Statement of the thesis.
600 10 $aCoccejus, Johannes,$d1603-1669.
650 0 $aCovenant theology.
630 00 $aBible.$pHebrews$xCriticism, interpretation, etc.$xHistory$y17th century.
650 17 $aHebreeën (bijbelboek)$2gtt
650 17 $aExegese.$2gtt
650 17 $aReformatie.$2gtt
650 17 $aVerbond.$2gtt
600 17 $aCoccejus, Johannes.$2swd
630 07 $aHebräerbrief 7,1-10,18.$2swd
650 07 $aFöderaltheologie.$2swd
650 07 $aExegese.$2swd
655 7 $aCriticism, interpretation, etc.$2fast
655 7 $aHistory.$2fast
776 08 $iOnline version:$aLee, Brian J.$tJohannes Cocceius and the exegetical roots of federal theology.$dGöttingen : Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2009$w(OCoLC)891464771
830 0 $aReformed historical theology ;$vv. 7.
988 $a20100909
049 $aBHAA
906 $0OCLC