MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

LEADER: 03170cam a2200397 a 4500
001 012586234-2
005 20131113060713.0
008 091215s2010 mdua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2009052695
015 $aGBB083855$2bnb
016 7 $a015600553$2Uk
020 $a9780801896675 (hardcover : alk. paper)
020 $a0801896673 (hardcover : alk. paper)
035 0 $aocn490811336
035 $a(PromptCat)40018333446
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dYDX$dYDXCP$dUKM$dCDX$dBWX
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aD744.7.U6$bB635 2010
082 00 $a940.53/73$222
100 1 $aBodnar, John E.,$d1944-
245 14 $aThe "Good War" in American memory /$cJohn Bodnar.
260 $aBaltimore :$bJohns Hopkins University Press,$c2010.
300 $ax, 299 p. :$bill. ;$c24 cm.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aWartime -- Soldiers write the war -- "No place for weaklings" -- Monuments and mourning -- The split screen -- The outsiders -- The victors -- Conclusion -- Postscript on Iraq.
520 1 $a"2003 Outstanding Academic Title, Choice" ""An uncommonly well balanced account of the political biases of American movies... A fine read for the generalist yet a scholarly achievement."---Choice" ""You cannot but be seduced and even sometimes bedazzled by Bodnar's clear, well-informed and impartial analysis."---Cercles" ""Bodnar provides a useful provocation. He asks us to think imaginatively about the subtle and complex ways movies communicate ideas and attitudes."---Journal of American History" ""Open minded and even handed, he appreciates the nuances and mixed messages of Hollywood cinema."---American Historical Review" "The "Good War" in American Memory dispels the long-held myth that Americans forged an agreement on why they had to fight in World War II. John Bodnar's sociocultural examination of the vast public debate that took place in the United States over the war's meaning reveals that the idea of the "good war" was highly contested." "Bodnar's comprehensive study of the disagreements that marked the American remembrance of World War II in the six decades following its end draws on an array of sources: fiction and nonfiction, movies, theater, and public monuments. He identifies alternative strands of memory---tragic and brutal versus heroic and virtuous---and reconstructs controversies involving veterans, minorities, and memorials. In building this narrative, Bodnar shows how the idealism of President Franklin Roosevelt's Four Freedoms was lost in the public commemoration of World War II, how the war's memory became intertwined in the larger discussion over American national identity, and how it only came to be known as the "good war" many years after its conclusion."--BOOK JACKET.
650 0 $aWorld War, 1939-1945$xSocial aspects$zUnited States.
650 0 $aCollective memory$zUnited States.
650 0 $aMemory$xSocial aspects$zUnited States.
650 0 $aWar and society$zUnited States.
650 0 $aNational characteristics, American.
730 0 $aProject Muse UPCC books$5net
899 $a415_565387
899 $a415_565646
988 $a20101008
906 $0DLC