Record ID | harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.12.20150123.full.mrc:440442808:1878 |
Source | harvard_bibliographic_metadata |
Download Link | /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.12.20150123.full.mrc:440442808:1878?format=raw |
LEADER: 01878cam a2200361 a 4500
001 012587693-9
005 20101020150502.0
008 100317s2010 cau b 001 0 eng c
010 $a 2010011546
020 $a9780804753111 (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a0804753113 (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a9780804753128 (pbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a0804753121 (pbk. : alk. paper)
035 0 $aocn562780959
040 $aCSt/DLC$cDLC$dYDXCP$dC#P$dRCJ$dBWX$dMH-L
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF8775$b.B93 2010
082 00 $a347.73/12$222
100 1 $aBybee, Keith J.,$d1965-
245 10 $aAll judges are political--except when they are not :$bacceptable hypocrisies and the rule of law /$cKeith J. Bybee.
260 $aStanford, Calif. :$bStanford Law Books,$cc2010.
300 $a177 p. ;$c23 cm.
490 0 $aThe cultural lives of law
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aLegal realism : dead and alive -- Elements of common courtesy -- The rule of law as the rules of etiquette.
520 $a"The legitimacy of our courts rests on their capacity to give broadly acceptable answers to controversial questions. Yet Americans are divided in their beliefs about whether our courts operate on unbiased legal principle or political interest. Comparing law to the practice of common courtesy, Keith Bybee explains how our courts not only survive under these suspicions of hypocrisy, but actually depend on them."--[book cover].
650 0 $aJudicial process$zUnited States.
650 0 $aPolitical questions and judicial power$zUnited States.
650 0 $aRule of law$zUnited States.
776 08 $iOnline version:$aBybee, Keith J., 1965-$tAll judges are political--except when they are not.$dStanford, Calif. : Stanford Law Books, ©2010$w(OCoLC)742287731
988 $a20101013
906 $0OCLC