It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

Record ID harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.12.20150123.full.mrc:491127082:1796
Source harvard_bibliographic_metadata
Download Link /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.12.20150123.full.mrc:491127082:1796?format=raw

LEADER: 01796nam a2200241Ka 4500
001 012632417-4
005 20120207105740.0
008 090528s2010 maua b 000|0 eng d
035 0 $aocn691917250
100 1 $aBecker, Bo.
245 10 $aDoes shareholder proxy access improve firm value? :$bevidence from the Business Roundtable Challenge /$cBo Becker, Daniel Bergstresser, Guhan Subramanian.
260 $a[Boston] :$bHarvard Business School,$cc2010.
300 $a43 p. :$bill. ;$c28 cm.
490 1 $aWorking paper / Harvard Business School ;$v11-052
500 $a"November 2010"--Publisher's website.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 $aWe measure the value of shareholder proxy access by using a recent development in the ability of shareholders to nominate candidates for board seats. We use the SEC's October 4, 2010 announcement that it would significantly delay implementation of its August 2010 proxy access rule as a natural experiment. Because firms with substantial institutional ownership would have been most affected by the SEC's now-delayed changes, we use the share and composition of institutional investors to sort firms into those more and less affected by the October 4 news. Firms that would have been most affected by proxy access, as measured by institutional ownership, lost value on that day. The value drop was 55 basis points for a 10 percentage point change in activist institution ownership. These results suggest that financial markets placed a positive value on shareholder access, as implemented in the SEC's August 2010 Rule.
700 1 $aBergstresser, Daniel.
700 1 $aSubramanian, Guhan.
710 2 $aHarvard Business School.
830 0 $aWorking paper (Harvard Business School) ;$v11-052.
988 $a20101207
906 $0MH