MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

LEADER: 02121cam a2200361 i 4500
001 013882556-4
005 20140225140433.0
008 130911s2013 ilu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2013029158
020 $a9780830840311 (pbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a0830840311 (pbk. : alk. paper)
035 0 $aocn845516341
035 $a(PromptCat)40022981930
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dYDXCP$dBTCTA$dBDX$dTLE$dGGB
042 $apcc
050 00 $aBS2320$b.K785 2013
082 00 $a225.1/2$223
100 1 $aKruger, Michael J.
245 14 $aThe question of Canon :$bchallenging the status quo in the New Testament debate /$cMichael J. Kruger.
264 1 $aDowners Grove, IL :$bInterVarsity Press,$c2013.
300 $a256 pages ;$c23 cm
336 $atext$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 $aKruger examines modern scholarship's view that the New Testament is a late creation of the church imposed on books originally written for another purpose. He tackles the five most prevalent objections to the classic understanding of a quickly emerging, self-authenticating collection of authoritative scriptures, and addresses foundational and paradigmatic assumptions of the extrinsic model as he provides powerful rebuttals and further support for the classic, "intrinsic" view.
505 0 $aThe definion of canon: must we make a sharp distinction between the definitions of canon and scripture? -- The origins of canon: was there really nothing in early Christianity that may have led to a canon? -- The writing of canon: were early Christians averse to written documents? -- The authors of canon: were the New Testament authors unaware of their own authority? -- The date of canon: were the New Testament books first regarded as scripture at the end of the second century?
630 00 $aBible.$pNew Testament$xCanon.
630 00 $aBible.$pNew Testament$xHistory.
630 00 $aBible.$pNew Testament$xEvidences, authority, etc.
899 $a245_444963
988 $a20131225
906 $0DLC