MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

LEADER: 08719cam a22018855 4500
001 013149696-4
005 20141003123936.0
008 091206s1992 no 000 u eng d
020 $a8271773232
020 $a9788271773236
245 00 $aEvaluation of the special Grant for environment and development.
260 $aOslo :$bRoyal Ministry of foreign affairs,$c1992.
300 $a118 p.
520 8 $aTable of contents:.
520 8 $aExecutive summary.
520 8 $a1. The special Grant for environment and development.
520 8 $a1.1 Background.
520 8 $a1.2 Objectives and guidelines for the Grant.
520 8 $a1.3 Financial frame of the Grant.
520 8 $a1.4 Norwegian environmental assistance in perspective.
520 8 $a1.5 Administrative set-up for the Grant.
520 8 $a1.6 Overview of Grant activities.
520 8 $a2. Evaluation methodology.
520 8 $a2.1 Terms of reference.
520 8 $a2.1.1 The Grant.
520 8 $a2.1.2 Norwegian aid cooperation with IUCN.
520 8 $a2.2 Key concepts for the evaluation.
520 8 $a2.2.1 Catalytic effect.
520 8 $a2.2.2 Awareness raising.
520 8 $a2.2.3 Administrative capacity strengthening.
520 8 $a2.2.4 Strengthening of professional competence.
520 8 $a2.2.5 Recipient orientation and prioritization.
520 8 $a2.3 Methods.
520 8 $a2.3.1 Project inventory and categorization of projects.
520 8 $a2.3.2 Information gathering, sampling and field work methodology.
520 8 $a2.4 Discussions.
520 8 $a3. Application of the Grant: Description and assessment.
520 8 $a3.1 NORAD.
520 8 $a3.1.1 Overview.
520 8 $a3.1.2 NORADs management of the Grant.
520 8 $a3.1.3 The Grant and NORADs partner countries - the cases of Tanzania,.
520 8 $aZambia and Sri Lanka.
520 8 $a3.1.4 Use of the Grant in relation to the Key Concepts.
520 8 $a3.1.4.1 The Grant and Norwegian development assistance - The catalytic.
520 8 $aeffect of the Grant.
520 8 $a3.1.4.2 The Grant and awareness raising.
520 8 $a3.1.4.3 The Grant and administrative capacity strengthening.
520 8 $a3.1.4.4 The Grant and professional/scientific competence strengthening.
520 8 $a3.1.4.5 The Grant and the environmental profile of the country.
520 8 $a3.1.4.6 The Grant and the role of the NORAD resident representative.
520 8 $a3.1.5 Conclusions.
520 8 $a3.2 Multilateral use of the Grant.
520 8 $a3.2.1 A brief overview of multilateral Grant cooperation volume and.
520 8 $astructure.
520 8 $a3.2.2 The diversity of multilateral Grant cooperation.
520 8 $a3.2.3 A brief overview of Grant cooperation with the World Bank.
520 8 $a3.2.4 The Ministry's integrated administration of the bank's share of the.
520 8 $aGrant.
520 8 $a3.2.5 The complex myriad of special grants and other funds in the World.
520 8 $aBank.
520 8 $a3.2.6 Within-bank administration of Norwegian Grant funds: Alternative.
520 8 $aoptions.
520 8 $a3.2.7 The complex task of establishing an operational technical assistance.
520 8 $aGrant for environment (TAGPE).
520 8 $a3.2.8 Catalytic impacts of the Grant: Additionality or earlier startup.
520 8 $a3.2.9 The Grant's awareness-raising role trough bank-funded work.
520 8 $a3.2.10 Awareness and catalytic effects: The case of national environmental.
520 8 $aaction plans (NEAPs).
520 8 $a3.2.11 Conclusions.
520 8 $a3.3 Use of the Grant by the program department of the ministry of foreign.
520 8 $aaffairs.
520 8 $a3.3.1 Overview of roles and activities.
520 8 $a3.3.2 A brief overview of the IIED cooperation.
520 8 $a3.3.3 Catalytic- and awareness-raising effects - An assessment.
520 8 $a3.3.4 Utilization, follow-up and cooperation with IIED.
520 8 $a3.3.5 Conclusions.
520 8 $a3.4 The use of the Grant for information activities.
520 8 $a3.4.1 Overview of activities and structure.
520 8 $a3.4.2 The information department's use of the Grant.
520 8 $a3.4.3 Activities of collaboration with PANOS.
520 8 $a3.4.4 Evaluation of the PANOS use of the Grant.
520 8 $a3.4.5 Assessment of the administration of Grant financed information.
520 8 $aactivities.
520 8 $a3.4.6 Conclusions.
520 8 $a4. Norwegian aid cooperation with IUCN.
520 8 $a4.1 IUCN - what is it, how does it work?.
520 8 $a4.1.1 Transformation towards conservation for development.
520 8 $a4.1.2 Organizing towards development issues.
520 8 $a4.1.3 The IUCN partnership and membership strategy.
520 8 $a4.1.4 IUCN's operational goals and implementing activities.
520 8 $a4.1.5 IUCN and the project cycle.
520 8 $a4.1.6 IUCN accounting, monitoring, evaluation and reporting.
520 8 $a4.2 IUCN's role in Norway's environment Grant.
520 8 $a4.2.1 IUCN - a natural choice for NORAD's use of the Grant?.
520 8 $a4.2.2 Structure and development of IUCN's Grant portfolio.
520 8 $a4.2.3 IUCN's role in the NORAD market for project identification and.
520 8 $aformulation.
520 8 $a4.3 IUCN as a Grant executing agency for NORAD.
520 8 $a4.3.1 Norway's and NORAD's role as IUCN-contributor and client.
520 8 $a4.3.2 Management and administration of the IUCN-cooperation.
520 8 $a4.4 Effects of the IUCN-cooperation on norwegian competence.
520 8 $a4.4.1 Has the collaboration improved the competence in Norway's aid.
520 8 $aadministration?.
520 8 $a4.4.2 Potential and actual competence impacts on the norwegian professional.
520 8 $acommunity.
520 8 $a4.5 IUCN as a channel for cooperation with recipient countries.
520 8 $a4.5.1 Project identification, formulation and agreement facilitation.
520 8 $a4.5.2 IUCN's interacting role between recipients and NORAD in the process.
520 8 $aleading to project agreements.
520 8 $a4.5.3 National conservation strategies - patience for a sustainable process.
520 8 $apays off.
520 8 $a4.5.4 On the adequacy and efficiency of liaison and cooperation with local.
520 8 $apeople and affected parties.
520 8 $a4.5.5 Appropriateness of IUCN project personnel.
520 8 $a4.5.6 Counterpart training and transfer of knowledge.
520 8 $a4.5.7 Contribution to institutional capacity strengthening: Preparation for.
520 8 $alocal take-over of activities.
520 8 $a4.5.8 IUCN's efficiency as a means of channeling funds.
520 8 $a4.5.9 Cost-effectiveness assessment.
520 8 $a4.6 Conclusions.
520 8 $a5. Conclusions and recommendations.
520 8 $a5.1 Objectives and framework.
520 8 $a5.2 Strategy for the application of the Grant.
520 8 $a5.3 Utilization, follow-up and control of the Grant.
520 8 $a5.3.1 Concurrence of grant activities with environmental problems and.
520 8 $apriorities in recipient countries.
520 8 $a5.3.2 Integration of grant activities into administrative system of the.
520 8 $arecipient countries.
520 8 $a5.4 Management and administration.
520 8 $a5.4.1 Assessment of management model.
520 8 $a5.4.2 The cooperation with the ministry of environment.
520 8 $a5.4.3 The cooperation with IUCN and IIED.
520 8 $a5.4.4 The role of NORAD's resident representatives.
520 8 $a5.5 The financial size of the Grant.
520 8 $a5.6 Recommendatons.
520 8 $a5.6.1 Prolongation or termination of the grant.
520 8 $a5.6.2 Choice of channels.
520 8 $a5.6.3 Aims.
520 8 $a5.6.4 Priorities of the Grant.
520 8 $a5.6.5 Guidelines and channels.
520 8 $a5.6.6 Financial frame.
520 8 $a5.6.7 Administrative routines.
520 8 $aAnnexes.
520 8 $a1. Evaluation of the special Grant for environment and development - terms.
520 8 $aof reference.
520 8 $a2. Institutions where people have been interviewed.
520 8 $a3. The database.
650 4 $aEnvironment.
650 4 $aDevelopment.
650 4 $aDevelopment aid.
651 4 $aNorway.
653 $aEnvironment.
653 $aDevelopment.
653 $aDevelopment aid.
710 2 $aScanteam International.
710 2 $aNordic Consulting Group.
710 1 $aNorway.$bKgl. Utenriksdepartement
988 $a20120410
049 $aHLSS
906 $0MH