Record ID | harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.13.20150123.full.mrc:222265632:2141 |
Source | harvard_bibliographic_metadata |
Download Link | /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.13.20150123.full.mrc:222265632:2141?format=raw |
LEADER: 02141cam a2200301 a 4500
001 013186434-3
005 20120423123426.0
008 110715s2012 enka b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2011030302
020 $a9781107014619 (hbk.)
020 $a1107014611 (hbk.)
035 0 $aocn741751453
035 $a(PromptCat)99948664882
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dYDX$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dBWX$dCGU$dDLC
042 $apcc
050 00 $aK1401$b.G46 2012
082 00 $a346.04/8$223
084 $aLAW050000$2bisacsh
100 1 $aGeorge, Alexandra.
245 10 $aConstructing intellectual property /$cAlexandra George.
260 $aCambridge, U.K. :$aNew York :$bCambridge University Press,$c2012.
300 $axxviii, 405 p. :$bill. ;$c24 cm.
520 $a"What is 'intellectual property'? This book examines the way in which this important area of law is constructed by the legal system. It argues that intellectual property is a body of rules, created by the legal system, that regulate the documented forms of abstract objects, which are also defined into existence by the legal system. Intellectual property law thus constructs its own objects of regulation and it does so through the application of a collection of core concepts. By analyzing the metaphysical structure of intellectual property law and the concepts the legal system uses to construct 'intellectual property', the book sheds new light on the nature of this fascinating area of law. It explains anomalies between social and intellectual property uses of concepts such as authorship--here dubbed 'creatorship'--and originality and it helps to explain the role of intellectual property from a structural (rather than the traditional normative) perspective"--Provided by publisher.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 351-388) and index.
505 0 $aIntroduction -- The difficulty of defining 'intellectual property' -- The metaphysics of intellectual property -- Intellectual property's core criteria -- 'Family resemblance' and intellectual property -- Concluding remarks.
650 0 $aIntellectual property$xPhilosophy.
988 $a20120516
906 $0DLC