It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

Record ID harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.13.20150123.full.mrc:225858134:1881
Source harvard_bibliographic_metadata
Download Link /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.13.20150123.full.mrc:225858134:1881?format=raw

LEADER: 01881cam a2200313 a 4500
001 013189489-7
005 20120519224536.0
008 111129s2012 nyu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2011047475
020 $a9780231701228 (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a0231701225 (cloth : alk. paper)
035 0 $aocn320799263
035 $a(PromptCat)40020783506
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dYDX$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dOCLCO$dBWX
042 $apcc
050 00 $aJZ1242$b.M85 2012
082 00 $a325/.3$223
100 1 $aMuppidi, Himadeep.
245 14 $aThe colonial signs of international relations /$cHimadeep Muppidi.
260 $aNew York :$bColumbia University Press,$cc2012.
300 $axiii, 193 p. ;$c20 cm.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aIntroduction -- Shame and rage -- Numb and number -- Propriety and atrocity -- Zoological relations -- Humanitarianism and its violences -- Postcoloniality and IPE -- Cognition and complicity -- Conclusion.
520 0 $a"[The author] traces the subtle influence of colonial forms of knowledge on modern schools of international relations, following the translation and transformation of this knowledge within postcolonial settings. Concentrating on the way in which individuals and institutions read their historical past in light of contemporary criticisms and concerns, Muppidi finds that certain methods for discussing or representing the colonized have become acceptable while others have been condemned. Both, however, can be equally colonial in intent and purpose, and the difference in their reception lies in the "processes of translation" that make one visible, the other invisible, and ultimately maintain the framework of a global colonial order"--Jacket.
650 0 $aInternational relations.
650 0 $aImperialism.
899 $a415_356033
988 $a20120519
906 $0DLC