MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

LEADER: 02221cam a2200385 a 4500
001 013375042-6
005 20130426085409.0
008 120113s2012 ilua b 001 0 eng c
010 $a 2012001904
020 $a9780226291079 (cloth : alkaline paper)
020 $a0226291073 (cloth : alkaline paper)
020 $a9780226291086 (paperback : alkaline paper)
020 $a0226291081 (paperback : alkaline paper)
020 $z9780226291109 (e-book)
020 $z0226291103 (e-book)
035 0 $aocn774021191
040 $aICU/DLC$beng$cICU$erda$dDLC
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF8776$b.G538 2012
082 00 $a347.73/14$223
100 1 $aGibson, James L.,$d1951-
245 10 $aElecting judges :$bthe surprising effects of campaigning on judicial legitimacy /$cJames L. Gibson.
260 $aChicago ;$aLondon :$bUniversity of Chicago Press,$cc2012.
300 $axi, 226 pages :$bill. ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$2rdacarrier
490 0 $aChicago studies in American politics
505 0 $aThe "new style" judicial elections in the American states -- Republican Party of Minnesota v. White and perceptions of judicial impartiality -- Can campaign activity cross the line? -- Diffuse support for a state supreme court: judicial legitimacy in Kentucky -- Expectancy theory and judicial legitimacy -- Judges, elections, and the American mass public: the effects of judicial campaigns on the legitimacy of courts -- Judicial campaigns, elections for judges, and court legitimacy: do judicial elections really stink? -- Appendix A: legal developments post-White -- Appendix B: the surveys -- Appendix C: experimental vignettes -- Appendix D: question wording -- Appendix E: the distributions of key analytical variables -- Appendix F: interactive analysis -- Appendix G: measuring support for democratic institutions and processes -- Appendix H: question wording -- Appendix I: adding control variables.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 207-218) and index.
650 0 $aJudges$zUnited States$xElection.
650 0 $aJudicial ethics$zUnited States.
988 $a20121011
906 $0OCLC