Record ID | harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.13.20150123.full.mrc:553522931:3121 |
Source | harvard_bibliographic_metadata |
Download Link | /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.13.20150123.full.mrc:553522931:3121?format=raw |
LEADER: 03121cam a2200349 a 4500
001 013507891-1
005 20130104190416.0
008 120713s2012 dcua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2012028178
020 $a9780815724025 (pbk. : alk. paper)
020 $a0815724020 (pbk. : alk. paper)
035 0 $aocn794708175
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dYDX$dBTCTA$dBDX$dOCLCO$dDBI$dYDXCP$dBWX$dCGU
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aHV741$b.G645 2012
082 00 $a362.70973$223
100 1 $aGormley, William T.,$cJr.,$d1950-
245 10 $aVoices for children :$brhetoric and public policy /$cWilliam T. Gormley Jr.
260 $aWashington, D.C. :$bBrookings Institution Press,$cc2012.
300 $ax, 198 p. :$bill. ;$c23 cm.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 171-190) and index.
505 0 $aChildren : beloved but neglected -- The rise of economic arguments -- Arguments in different policy domains -- Arguments in different venues -- How frames shape public opinion -- Battling for kids in state capitols -- Capitol Hill debates about children -- Putting frames in perspective.
520 $a"The United States spends more on programs for the elderly than it does on programs that enhance child development and improve child welfare. Why has public policy neglected the development phase of young Americans' lives not only in substantive dollars spent, but also in program design and implementation? In Voices for Children, noted child care and education policy expert William Gormley highlights the portrayal of children's issues in both the mass media and in public policymaking to explain why children have gotten short shrift. A key explanation is the limited mass media coverage of strong arguments in support of children's programs. After documenting changes in rhetoric on children and public policy over time and variations across policy domains and government venues, Gormley demonstrates that some "issue frames" are more effective than others in persuading voters. In two randomized experiments, he finds that "economic" frames are more effective than "moralistic" frames in generating public support for children's programs. Independent voters are especially responsive to economic frames. In several illuminating case studies in Connecticut, Utah, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania, he finds that strong rhetoric makes a difference but that it is sometimes eclipsed by even stronger political and economic constraints. Voices for Children offers a fresh perspective on raging debates over child health, child poverty, child welfare, and education programs at the federal and state levels. It finds some hopeful examples that could transform how we think about children's issues and the kinds of public policies we adopt."--Publisher's website.
650 0 $aChild welfare$zUnited States.
650 0 $aChildren$zUnited States$xSocial conditions.
650 0 $aChildren$xServices for$zUnited States.
650 0 $aChild welfare$xGovernment policy$zUnited States.
710 2 $aBrookings Institution.
988 $a20121205
049 $aKSGG
906 $0DLC