| Record ID | harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.13.20150123.full.mrc:704565805:2435 |
| Source | harvard_bibliographic_metadata |
| Download Link | /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.13.20150123.full.mrc:704565805:2435?format=raw |
LEADER: 02435cam a2200397 i 4500
001 013653903-3
005 20130406224607.0
008 121203s2013 enk b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2012040848
020 $a9781844679775 (hardback : alk. paper)
020 $a1844679772 (hardback : alk. paper)
020 $a9781844679768 (paperback. : alk. paper)
020 $a1844679764 (paperback. : alk. paper)
035 0 $aocn841415910
035 0 $aocn783163488
035 $a(PromptCat)40022093030
040 $aDLC$erda$beng$cDLC$dYDX$dBTCTA$dBDX$dOCLCO$dYDXCP$dYNK$dRCJ$dBWX
042 $apcc
043 $ad------
050 00 $aJV51$b.C475 2013
082 00 $a325/.3$223
100 1 $aChibber, Vivek,$d1965-
245 10 $aPostcolonial theory and the specter of capital /$cVivek Chibber.
264 1 $aLondon :$bVerso,$c2013.
300 $axii, 306 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $tPostcolonial theory and subaltern studies --$tDominance without hegemony : the argument explained --$tDominance without hegemony : the argument assessed --$tDominance without hegemony : the argument in context --$tCapital's universalizing tendency --$tCapital, abstract labor, and difference --$tCulture, interests, and agency --$tInterests and the other universalism --$tThe (non)problem of historicism --$tThe nation unmoored --$gConclusion:$tSubaltern studies as ideology.
520 $aPostcolonial theory has become enormously influential as a framework for understanding the Global South. It is also a school of thought popular because of its rejection of the supposedly universalizing categories of the Enlightenment. In this devastating critique, mounted on behalf of the radical Enlightenment tradition, Vivek Chibber offers the most comprehensive response yet to postcolonial theory. Focusing on the hugely popular Subaltern Studies project, Chibber shows that its foundational arguments are based on a series of analytical and historical misapprehensions. He demonstrates that it is possible to affirm a universalizing theory without succumbing to Eurocentrism or reductionism. -- Publisher description.
650 0 $aPostcolonialism$zDeveloping countries.
650 0 $aCapitalism$zDeveloping countries.
899 $a415_565070
988 $a20130406
906 $0DLC