MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

LEADER: 02553nam a2200337Ia 4500
001 013741119-7
005 20130729150827.0
008 130509s2013 dcu b f000 0 eng c
035 0 $aocn842286113
040 $aDOS$cDOS
090 $aUA835$b.G639 2013
100 1 $aGodwin, Paul H. B.
245 10 $aChina's forbearance has limits:$bChinese threat and retaliation signaling and its implications for a Sino-American military confrontation /$cby Paul H.B. Godwin and Alice L. Miller.
260 $aWashington, D.C. :$bNational Defense University Press,$c[2013]
300 $a109 p. ;$c28 cm.
490 1 $aInstitute for National Strategic Studies China strategic perspectives ;$vno. 6
500 $a"April, 2013."
500 $a"Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University"--Cover.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 105-106).
520 $aThis study assesses the context and motivations of the PRC's use of military force since 1949. It then extracts Beijing's use of its calculus of warning statements in detail from several instances in which it has threatened and, in some cases, actually followed through with the use of military force to resolve a dispute. It offers several points to take into account in watching for and analyzing Beijing's use of this warnings calculus in contemporary contexts, and it offers a hypothetical scenario in which this calculus might appear in the context of China's claims in the South China Sea. -- Excerpted from introduction.
505 0 $aExecutive summary -- Introduction -- The record: Beijing's use of military force -- China's crisis decisionmaking process and crisis management -- Signaling the intent to employ military force- China's warnings calculus -- Signaling case studies- Taiwan -- Analyzing Beijing's signals- things to consider -- Conclusion- a hypothetical South China Sea signalling scenario -- Appendix 1 -- Appendix 2 -- Appendix 3 -- Notes -- Acknowlegments -- About the authors.
650 0 $aNational security$zPacific Area.
651 0 $aUnited States$xForeign relations$zChina.
651 0 $aChina$xForeign relations$zUnited States.
651 0 $aChina$xMilitary policy.
651 0 $aChina$xStrategic aspects.
700 1 $aMiller, Alice L.
710 2 $aNational Defense University.$bCenter for Strategic Research.
830 0 $aChina strategic perspectives (National Defense University. Institute for National Strategic Studies) ;$vno. 6.
988 $a20130729
906 $0OCLC