It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

Record ID harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.14.20150123.full.mrc:141627642:3106
Source harvard_bibliographic_metadata
Download Link /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.14.20150123.full.mrc:141627642:3106?format=raw

LEADER: 03106cam a2200457 a 4500
001 014102933-1
005 20141120100908.0
008 140401s2014 cc b 001 0 chi d
010 $a 2013377441
020 $a9787509756492
020 $a7509756499
035 0 $aocn875519085
040 $aBCBTC$beng$cBCBTC$dCNPIT$dDLC
041 0 $achi$feng
042 $alccopycat
050 00 $aB127.C65$bL592 2014
100 1 $6880-01$aLiu, Wei.
245 10 $6880-02$a"Kongzi jia yu" gong an tan yuan =$bA study on the controversy of Kongzi Jia Yu /$cLiu Wei zhu.
246 31 $aStudy on the controversy of Kongzi Jia Yu
250 $6880-03$aDi 1 ban.
260 $6880-04$aBeijing Shi :$bShe hui ke xue wen xian chu ban she,$c2014.
300 $a7, [1], 5, [1], 6, 258 p. ;$c24 cm.
490 0 $6880-05$aZhongguo she hui ke xue yuan wen ku. Li shi kao gu yan jiu xi lie =$aThe selected works of CASS. History and archaeology
500 $6880-06$a"Zhongguo she hui ke xue yuan chuang xin gong cheng xue shu chu ban zi zhu xiang mu"-Title page.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [203]-210) and indexes.
546 $aTable of contents also in English.
600 00 $aConfucius.
630 00 $6880-07$aKongzi jia yu.
650 0 $aPhilosophy, Confucian.
880 1 $6100-01$a刘巍.
880 10 $6245-02$a《孔子家语》公案探源 =$bA study on the controversy of Kongzi Jia Yu /$c刘巍著.
880 $6250-03$a第 1 版.
880 $6260-04$a北京市 :$b社会科学文献出版社,$c2014.
880 0 $6490-05$a中国社会科学院文库. 历史考古研究系列 =$aThe selected works of CASS. History and archaeology
880 0 $6490-00$a中国社会科学院文库
880 $6500-06$a"中国社会科学院创新工程学术出版资助项目"-Title page.
880 $6520-00$a《孔子家语》真伪问题, 是中国古代学术史上一个著名公案, 自魏晋以降即聚讼不已. 近来由于相关出土文献的激荡, 争论弥烈. 作者考镜源流、旁征博引、推陈出新, 着力从公案学的角度, 对与王肃伪造《家语》说相关的公案群进行透彻的爬梳与剔抉; 对此案产生的诸多取径进行认真的推究与归纳; 就王肃伪造五书之说对康有为刘歆遍伪群经说之影响进行翔实的辩白与驳议; 对此案所涉《家语》三序的可信性程度、孔安国身世等重要而又诸说纷纭的史事进行缜密的析说与考证. 作者认为: 郑学之徒马昭对《家语》为王肃"所增加"的指控无法置信; 王柏因缘《中庸》分篇案, 曲解唐颜师古的看法, 演绎出《家语》"古""今"文本两分的说法, 这一理论又为伪《古文尚书》案晚《书》文本两歧的趋同化思路而加固, 其实不能成立; 王肃之"序"与注"解"均表明, 肃欲依托作"圣证"的为孔子而非孔安国. "末序"所述孔安国生平著述行实, 历有渊源. 返本复初, 孔《序》称《家语》为孔安国"撰集"可以信从.
880 04 $6630-07$a孔子家语.
899 $a415_565896
988 $a20140624
906 $0OCLC