| Record ID | harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.14.20150123.full.mrc:170778197:1648 |
| Source | harvard_bibliographic_metadata |
| Download Link | /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.14.20150123.full.mrc:170778197:1648?format=raw |
LEADER: 01648cam a22003498i 4500
001 014125732-6
005 20140730145159.0
008 140318s2014 nyu b 000 0 eng
010 $a 2013041769
016 7 $a016682504$2Uk
020 $a9780199354801 (alk. paper)
020 $a0199354804 (alk. paper)
035 0 $aocn864846468
035 $a(PromptCat)40023839179
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dBTCTA$dBDX$dUKMGB$dOCLCO$dYDXCP
042 $apcc
050 00 $aB2798$b.B648 2014
082 00 $a193$223
100 1 $aBoehm, Omri.
245 10 $aKant's critique of Spinoza /$cOmri Boehm.
264 1 $aNew York, NY :$bOxford University Press,$c2014.
300 $axxxiv, 252 pages.$c22 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 8 $aContemporary philosophers frequently assume that Kant never seriously engaged with Spinoza or Spinozism - certainly not before the break of 'Der Pantheismusstreit', or within the 'Critique of Pure Reason'. Offering an alternative reading of key pre-critical texts and to some of the Critique's most central chapters, Omri Boehm challenges this common assumption. He argues that Kant not only is committed to Spinozism in early essays such as 'The One Possible Basis' and'New Elucidation, ' but also takes up Spinozist metaphysics as Transcendental Realism's most consistent form in the 'Critique of Pure Reason'.
600 10 $aKant, Immanuel,$d1724-1804.
600 10 $aSpinoza, Benedictus de,$d1632-1677.
899 $a415_565471
988 $a20140726
906 $0DLC