It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from harvard_bibliographic_metadata

Record ID harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.14.20150123.full.mrc:236556252:1918
Source harvard_bibliographic_metadata
Download Link /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.14.20150123.full.mrc:236556252:1918?format=raw

LEADER: 01918cam a2200397 i 4500
001 014172983-X
005 20141213020416.0
008 140428s2015 enk b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2014012991
020 $a9780190206444 (hardback : alkaline paper)
020 $a0190206446 (hardback : alkaline paper)
035 0 $aocn878812792
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dOCLCO$dBTCTA$dTFW$dGWL
042 $apcc
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aUA23$b.G643 2015
082 00 $a353.10973$223
100 1 $aGlennon, Michael J.,$d1947-$eauthor.
245 10 $aNational security and double government /$cMichael J. Glennon.
264 1 $aOxford ;$aNew York :$bOxford University Press,$c[2015]
300 $aix, 257 pages ;$c22 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 8 $aWhy has U.S. national security policy scarcely changed from the Bush to the Obama administration? And why does it matter? The theory of 'double government' posed by the 19th century English scholar Walter Bagehot suggests a disquieting answer. The public is encouraged to believe that the presidency, Congress, and the courts make security policy. That belief sustains these institutions' legitimacy. Yet their authority is largely illusory. National security policy is made, instead, by a 'Trumanite network' of several hundred members that is largely concealed from public view.
650 0 $aNational security$zUnited States$xManagement.
650 0 $aNational security$zUnited States$xDecision making.
650 0 $aLegislative oversight$zUnited States.
650 0 $aJudicial review$zUnited States.
650 0 $aGovernment accountability$zUnited States.
830 0 $aOxford scholarship online.$5net
899 $a415_566010
988 $a20140927
049 $aHLSS
906 $0DLC