| Record ID | harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.14.20150123.full.mrc:344139744:1661 |
| Source | harvard_bibliographic_metadata |
| Download Link | /show-records/harvard_bibliographic_metadata/ab.bib.14.20150123.full.mrc:344139744:1661?format=raw |
LEADER: 01661nam a2200373Ii 4500
001 014262435-7
005 20141218020750.0
006 m o d f
008 141121e201408 dcua ob f000 0 eng d
035 0 $aocn896726809
035 $a(FDLP)ocn896726809
040 $aGPO$beng$erda$epn$cGPO
074 $a1051-H-48 (online)
086 0 $aY 3.N 88:10/2127
100 1 $aForester, John,$eauthor.
245 14 $aThe international HRA empirical study :$blessons learned from comparing HRA methods predictions to HAMMLAB simulator data /$cprepared by John Forester [and twelve others].
246 30 $aInternational Human Reliability Analysis empirical study
264 1 $aWashington, DC :$bOffice of Nuclear Regulatory Research, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission,$cAugust 2014.
300 $a1 online resource (xxx, 120 pages) :$bcolor llustrations
336 $atext$2rdacontent
337 $acomputer$2rdamedia
338 $aonline resource$2rdacarrier
500 $a"Manuscript completed: December 2012; date published: August 2014."
500 $aTitle from title screen (viewed on Nov. 20, 2014).
500 $a"NUREG 2127."
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 109-110).
650 0 $aNuclear power plants$xHuman factors.
650 0 $aNuclear reactors$xSafety measures.
650 0 $aNuclear power plants$xSafety measures.
610 20 $aOECD Halden Reactor Project.
710 2 $aU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.$bOffice of Nuclear Regulatory Research,$eissuing body.
776 08 $iPaper version:$aForester, John.$tInternational HRA empirical study$w(OCoLC)890377798
988 $a20141218
906 $0OCLC