| Record ID | ia:goddebatebetween0000crai |
| Source | Internet Archive |
| Download MARC XML | https://archive.org/download/goddebatebetween0000crai/goddebatebetween0000crai_marc.xml |
| Download MARC binary | https://www.archive.org/download/goddebatebetween0000crai/goddebatebetween0000crai_meta.mrc |
LEADER: 04098cam a22008174a 4500
001 ocm51476956
003 OCoLC
005 20191109072830.3
008 030110s2004 enk b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2003042040
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dYDX$dUKM$dCVN$dBAKER$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dOCLCG$dSTF$dOCLCQ$dBTN$dGEBAY$dOCLCQ$dIG#$dBDX$dIAD$dOCLCF$dOCLCQ$dKOL$dOCLCQ$dWLF$dDHA$dOCLCQ
015 $aGBA372630$2bnb
015 $aGBA3V9988$2bnb
016 7 $a012915120$2Uk
019 $a52696666$a223495206$a416173505$a936059221
020 $a0195165993$q(alk. paper)
020 $a9780195165999$q(alk. paper)
020 $a0195166000$q(pbk. ;$qalk. paper)
020 $a9780195166002$q(pbk. ;$qalk. paper)
029 1 $aAU@$b000024359390
029 1 $aAU@$b000025022716
029 1 $aGEBAY$b7154549
029 1 $aNLGGC$b248214756
029 1 $aNZ1$b7436025
029 1 $aUKTLS$b116835796
029 1 $aUNITY$b023575441
029 1 $aUNITY$b042220335
029 1 $aUNITY$b116835796
035 $a(OCoLC)51476956$z(OCoLC)52696666$z(OCoLC)223495206$z(OCoLC)416173505$z(OCoLC)936059221
042 $apcc
050 00 $aBT103$b.C73 2004
082 00 $a212/.1$221
086 0 $aBT103 .C73 2004
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aCraig, William Lane.
245 10 $aGod? :$ba debate between a Christian and an atheist /$cWilliam Lane Craig, Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.
260 $aOxford ;$aNew York :$bOxford University Press,$c2004.
300 $axii, 156 pages ;$c22 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aPoint/counterpoint series
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 0 $aFive reasons God exists / William Lane Craig -- There is no good reason to believe in God / Walter Sinnott-Armstrong -- Reason enough / William Lane Craig -- Some reasons to believe that there is no God / Walter Sinnott-Armstrong -- Theism undefeated / William Lane Craig -- Atheism undaunted / Walter Sinnott-Armstrong.
520 1 $a"In God?, William Lane Craig and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong bring to the printed page two debates they held before live audiences, preserving all the wit, clarity, and immediacy of their public exchanges. With none of the opaque discourse of academic logicians and divinity-school theologians, the authors make claims and comebacks that cut with precision. Their arguments are sharp and humorous, as each philosopher strikes quickly to the heart of his opponent's case. For example, Craig claims that we must believe in God to explain objective moral values, such as why rape is wrong. Sinnott-Armstrong responds that what makes rape wrong is the harm to victims of rape, so rape is immoral even if there is no God."--Jacket.
590 $bInternet Archive - 2
590 $bInternet Archive 2
650 0 $aGod$xProof.
650 0 $aAtheism.
650 7 $aAtheism.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00819974
650 7 $aGod$xProof.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00944100
650 07 $aGottesfrage.$2swd
650 07 $aAtheismus.$2swd
650 07 $aTheismus.$2swd
650 07 $aDialog.$2swd
650 07 $aGott.$2swd
650 07 $aExistenz.$2swd
700 1 $aSinnott-Armstrong, Walter,$d1955-
830 0 $aPoint/counterpoint series (Oxford, England)
856 41 $3ebrary$uhttp://site.ebrary.com/id/10103626
856 41 $3Table of contents$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0614/2003042040-t.html
856 42 $3Contributor biographical information$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0726/2003042040-b.html
856 42 $3Publisher description$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0614/2003042040-d.html
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c25.00$d18.75$i0195165993$n0004154766$sactive
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c19.95$d19.95$i0195166000$n0004154767$sactive
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n00559296$c$19.95
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n2003042040
938 $aIngram$bINGR$n9780195165999
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n1981862
994 $a92$bERR
976 $a31927000608866