MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 04418cam 2200757 i 4500
001 ocm24429805
003 OCoLC
005 20201023022234.0
008 910828t19921992enk b 001 0 eng
010 $a 91034240
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dUKM$dEL$$dMUQ$dBAKER$dNLGGC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dGEBAY$dUKMGB$dGBVCP$dOCLCO$dOCLCF$dOCLCA$dOCLCQ$dDEBBG$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dUPM$dUWO$dOCLCA
015 $aGB9232740$2bnb
016 7 $a012600720$2Uk
019 $a27726538$a1167081200$a1176209215
020 $a0198242794
020 $a9780198242796
035 $a(OCoLC)24429805$z(OCoLC)27726538$z(OCoLC)1167081200$z(OCoLC)1176209215
050 00 $aH61$b.B4745 1992
082 00 $a300/.72$220
084 $a70.03$2bcl
084 $a70.08$2bcl
084 $aMR 1100$2rvk
100 1 $aBhargava, Rajeev,$eauthor.
245 10 $aIndividualism in social science :$bforms and limits of a methodology /$cRajeev Bhargava.
264 1 $aOxford :$bClarendon Press ;$aNew York :$bOxford University Press,$c1992.
264 4 $c©1992
300 $aviii, 271 pages ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aOxford philosophical monographs
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 253-261) and index.
520 $aThe literature on methodological individualism is characterized by two widely held assumptions: first that most formulations of the doctrine have been inadequate and enigmatic; and secondly that if the doctrine were to be stated with sufficient care it would be seen to be trivially true. Dr Bhargava challenges the second of these assumptions. He begins by disentangling the different forms of methodological individualism, and then shows that even in its most plausible version it is neither trivial, nor obviously true. He argues that assertions of its trivially true character are merely rhetorical devices, concealing deeper ontological and methodological issues that divide the individualist from the non-individualist. Both agree that actions are partly constituted by beliefs, but for the individualist beliefs are mental attitudes individuated wholly in terms of what lies within the individual mind, whereas for the non-individualist beliefs also lie embedded in social practice, and must be partly individuated in relation to social contexts. The author argues that, once the key individualist assumption is challenged, the way is clear for a rehabilitation of a non-individualist methodology which permits an independent study of social contexts, and a contextual study of the beliefs and actions of individuals.
650 0 $aSocial sciences$xMethodology.
650 0 $aIndividualism.
650 6 $aSciences sociales$xMéthodologie.
650 6 $aIndividualisme.
650 7 $aIndividualism.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00970328
650 7 $aSocial sciences$xMethodology.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01122933
650 17 $aMethodologie.$2gtt
650 17 $aSociaal-wetenschappelijk onderzoek.$2gtt
650 17 $aSociale wetenschappen.$2gtt
650 17 $aIndividualisme.$2gtt
650 7 $aIndividualismus$2gnd
650 7 $aMethodologischer Individualismus$2gnd
650 7 $aSozialwissenschaften$2gnd
653 0 $aSocial sciences$aResearch
776 08 $iOnline version:$aBhargava, Rajeev.$tIndividualism in social science.$dOxford : Clarendon Press ; New York : Oxford University Press, 1992$w(OCoLC)654814551
830 0 $aOxford philosophical monographs.
856 41 $3Table of contents$uhttp://www.gbv.de/dms/hbz/toc/ht004256855.PDF
856 41 $3Table of contents$uhttp://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=003624279&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
856 42 $3Publisher description$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0636/91034240-d.html
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c100.00$d100.00$i0198242794$n0002056327$sactive
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n91034240
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n112667
029 1 $aAU@$b000008459577
029 1 $aDEBBG$bBV005799031
029 1 $aGBVCP$b113756380
029 1 $aGEBAY$b1762219
029 1 $aHEBIS$b022572074
029 1 $aNLGGC$b086802631
029 1 $aNZ1$b4283665
029 1 $aUNITY$b009596437
029 1 $aYDXCP$b112667
994 $aZ0$bP4A
948 $hNO HOLDINGS IN P4A - 253 OTHER HOLDINGS