MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 04529cam 2200721Ia 4500
001 ocm53022892
003 OCoLC
005 20200101185352.0
008 030915s2003 enk b 000 0 eng d
040 $aR#A$beng$cR#A$dIXA$dUKM$dNDD$dNLGGC$dYDXCP$dOCLCQ$dOCLCG$dAU@$dZWZ$dOCLCA$dOCLCQ$dUKBCI$dA7U$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dUZ0$dDHA$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dOCLCF$dPAU$dEUM
015 $aGBA3Y2133$2bnb
019 $a51913782
020 $a1840464682
020 $a9781840464689
035 $a(OCoLC)53022892$z(OCoLC)51913782
050 14 $aQ175.46$b.F85 2003
082 04 $a501$222
084 $a08.35$2bcl
100 1 $aFuller, Steve,$d1959-
245 10 $aKuhn vs. Popper :$bthe struggle for the soul of science /$cSteve Fuller.
246 30 $aStruggle for the soul of science
260 $aCambridge :$bIcon,$c2003.
300 $a228 pages ;$c20 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aRevolutions in science
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
520 1 $a"Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper, a young historian and an old philosopher, met just once to discuss the nature of science. Yet, for the last half-century this encounter has dominated public discussions on the topic. Nearly every course on the scientific method today makes reference to 'Kuhn vs. Popper' as a watershed, in which Kuhn's supposedly pluralistic vision of science triumphed over Popper's more monolithic one." "The future of science itself depends on understanding the philosophical, political and even religious basis of what separated Kuhn and Popper. Drawing on his own original examination of the Kuhn archives at MIT, Fuller provides a reliable guide to these matters. The result is a account of a landmark confrontation in which 'the wrong guy' won."--Jacket.
505 00 $gCh. 1.$tIn Search of the Causes of a Non-Event --$gCh. 2.$tKuhn and Popper: A Case of Mistaken Identities --$gCh. 3.$tPopperian Suspicions and Kuhnian Vindication --$gCh. 4.$tWe've Been Here Before: The Prehistory of the Debate --$gCh. 5.$tDialectics as the Pulse of Scientific Progress --$gCh. 6.$tA Parting Shot at the Misunderstanding --$gCh. 7.$tWhy Philosophers Get No Respect from Scientists --$gCh. 8.$tSo, Why Are Philosophers of Science Pro-Science? --$gCh. 9.$tThe Return of the Repressed: Philosophers as Tory Historians of Science --$gCh. 10.$tThe Religious Unconscious of the Debate --$gCh. 11.$tDo We Believe by Evidence or by Decision? A Very Short History of Epistemology --$gCh. 12.$tThe University as the Absent Presence of the Kuhn-Popper Debate --$gCh. 13.$tPopper and Adorno United: The Rationalist Left at Positivism's Wake --$gCh. 14.$tPopper and Adorno Divided: The Rationalist Left Haunted by Historicism --$gCh. 15.$tHow to be Responsible for Ideas -- the Popperian Way --$gCh. 16.$tFailing the Popperian Test for Intellectual Responsibility: Rorty on Heidegger --$gCh. 17.$tIs Thomas Kuhn the American Heidegger?
600 10 $aKuhn, Thomas S.
600 10 $aPopper, Karl R.$q(Karl Raimund),$d1902-1994.
600 17 $aKuhn, Thomas Samuel,$d(1922-1996)$2ram
600 17 $aPopper, Karl Raimund,$d(1902-1994)$2ram
600 17 $aKuhn, Thomas S.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00015867
600 17 $aPopper, Karl R.$q(Karl Raimund),$d1902-1994.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01717209
600 14 $aKuhn, Thomas S.
600 14 $aPopper, Karl Raimund,$cSir,$d1902-
650 0 $aScience$xPhilosophy$xSocial aspects$xHistory$y20th century.
650 0 $aScience$xPhilosophy$xPolitical aspects$xHistory$y20th century.
650 0 $aKnowledge, Theory of$xHistory$y20th century.
650 17 $aPolemiek.$2gtt
650 7 $aPhilosophie des sciences.$2ram
650 7 $aKnowledge, Theory of.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00988194
648 7 $a1900-1999$2fast
655 7 $aHistory.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01411628
830 0 $aRevolutions in science.
856 42 $3The Edward Potts Cheyney Memorial Fund Home Page$uhttp://hdl.library.upenn.edu/1017.12/366197
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n100338432
029 1 $aAU@$b000024914731
029 1 $aAU@$b000045225958
029 1 $aNZ1$b7582318
029 1 $aUKBCI$b048050326
029 1 $aUKBNS$b048050326
029 1 $aUKBOR$b048050326
029 1 $aUKBRU$b172337
029 1 $aUKSCO$b048050326
029 1 $aUKSGC$b048050326
029 1 $aUKSOM$b048050326
029 1 $aUNITY$b048050326
029 1 $aYDXCP$b100338432
994 $aZ0$bP4A
948 $hNO HOLDINGS IN P4A - 147 OTHER HOLDINGS