It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 02544cam a2200277 a 4500
001 521745080
008 100205s2010 nju b 001 0 eng
020 $a9780691137193 (alk. paper)
020 $a0691137196 (alk. paper)
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dYDX$dYDXCP$dUKM$dCDX$dBWX$dLGG$dGUL$dMARCIVE
043 $an-us---
049 $astack
050 00 $aKF306$b.W458 2010
100 1 $aWendel, W. Bradley,$d1969-
245 10 $aLawyers and fidelity to law /$cW. Bradley Wendel.
260 $aPrinceton, N.J. :$bPrinceton University Press,$cc2010.
300 $axii, 286 p. ;$c25 cm.
520 1 $a"Even Lawyers who obey the law often seem to act unethically---interfering with the discovery of truth, subverting justice, and inflicting harm on innocent people. Standard arguments within legal ethics attempt to show why it is permissible to do something as a lawyer that it would be wrong to do as an ordinary person. But in the view of most critics these arguments fail to turn wrongs into rights. Even many lawyers think legal ethics is flawed because it does not accurately describe the considerable moral value of their work. In Lawyers and Fidelity to Law, Bradley Wendel introduces a new conception of legal ethics that addresses the concerns of lawyers and their critics alike." "Wendel proposes an ethics grounded on the political value of law as a collective achievement that settles intractable conflicts, allowing people who disagree profoundly to live together in a peaceful, stable society. Lawyers must be loyal and competent client representatives, Wendel argues, but these obligations must always be exercised within the law that constitutes their own roles and confers rights and duties upon their clients. Lawyers act unethically when they treat the law as an inconvenient obstacle to be worked around and when they twist and distort it to help their clients do what they are not legally entitled to do. Lawyers and Fidelity to Law challenges lawyers and their critics to reconsider the nature and value of ethical representation."--BOOK JACKET.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 213-282) and index.
650 0 $aLegal ethics$zUnited States.
907 $a.b10631082
999 $astack$b3$c101108$dm$ep$f-$g0
991 $bstack
949 $g1$i30700010421526$j0$lstack$o-$p$0.00$q-$r-$s-$t0$u9$v0$w9$x0$y.i9908754$z101108
949 $g2$i30700010348224$j0$ldigt $o-$p$0.00$q-$r-$sn$t0$u5$v0$w5$x0$y.i10098951$z110929
949 $g3$i30700010348232$j0$lstack$o-$p$0.00$q-$r-$s-$t0$u4$v1$w4$x0$y.i1009894x$z110929