MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 04736cam 2200745 i 4500
001 ocm33983795
003 OCoLC
005 20200928041704.0
008 951219s1996 pauab b s001 0 eng
010 $a 95053044
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dBAKER$dYDXCP$dBTCTA$dPIT$dUAB$dGEBAY$dGBVCP$dOCLCO$dOCLCF$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dBDX$dOCLCQ$dOCLCA$dUKMGB$dPIT$dOCLCO
016 7 $a007427346$2Uk
019 $a1141628116
020 $a0822939401$q(cloth ;$qacid-free paper)
020 $a9780822939405$q(cloth ;$qacid-free paper)
020 $a0822955970$q(pbk. ;$qacid-free paper)
020 $a9780822955979$q(pbk. ;$qacid-free paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)33983795$z(OCoLC)1141628116
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aJK2261$b.G56 1996
082 00 $a324.273$220
084 $a7,26$2ssgn
100 1 $aGimpel, James G.,$eauthor.
245 10 $aNational elections and the autonomy of American state party systems /$cJames Gimpel.
260 $aPittsburgh, Pa. :$bUniversity of Pittsburgh Press,$c©1996.
300 $axi, 241 pages :$billustrations, maps ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aPitt series in policy and institutional studies
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 231-236) and index.
530 $aAlso available online.
505 0 $a1. National Elections and the Autonomy of American State Party Systems -- 2. The Variants of Two-Party Competition -- 3. The Once Firm Foundation: New York and New Jersey -- 4. Deindustrialization and the Erosion of Party Unity: Ohio and Pennsylvania -- 5. Candidate-Centered Politics in the Desert Southwest: New Mexico and Arizona -- 6. Panning for Partisans in a Turbulent Environment: California -- 7. Where Federalism Is a Solvent of Party: The Pacific Northwest -- 8. Sectionalism Disrupts the Party System: Idaho -- 9. Competition and the Sources of Candidate-Centeredness in State Politics.
520 $aTraditional theories of party organization have emphasized two-party electoral competition as the force behind party unity in state politics. V.O. Key first advanced this theory in Southern Politics, where he concluded that party factionalism in the South was mainly attributable to the one-party character of the region. But this traditional theory does not fit all states equally well. In the states of the West, especially, parties are competitive, but political activity is centered on candidates, not parties. The theory of candidate-centered politics allows Gimpel to explain why party factionalism has persisted in many regions of the United States in spite of fierce two-party competition. Using interviews, polling data, elections returns, and demographic information, Gimpel contends that major upheavals in the two-party balance of presidential voting may leave lower offices untouched.
610 17 $aUSA$bPresident$2gnd
650 0 $aPolitical parties$zUnited States$xStates.
650 0 $aState governments$zUnited States.
650 7 $aPolitical parties$xU.S. states.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01069444
650 7 $aState governments.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01131814
651 7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
650 7 $aBundesstaaten$2gnd
650 7 $aParteiensystem$2gnd
650 7 $aPräsidentenwahl$2gnd
650 7 $aKongresswahl$2gnd
651 7 $aUSA.$2swd
653 0 $aPolitical parties$aUnited States$aStates
653 0 $aState governments$aUnited States
776 08 $iElectronic reproduction:$aGimpel, James G.$tNational elections and the autonomy of American state party systems.$dPittsburgh, Pa. : University of Pittsburgh Press, ©1996$w(OCoLC)319431314
776 08 $iOnline version:$aGimpel, James G.$tNational elections and the autonomy of American state party systems.$dPittsburgh, Pa. : University of Pittsburgh Press, ©1996$w(OCoLC)603755313
830 0 $aPitt series in policy and institutional studies.
856 41 $3Table of contents$uhttp://www.gbv.de/dms/bowker/toc/9780822939405.pdf
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c45.00$d45.00$i0822939401$n0002802758$sactive$zB&T Title: National Elections and the Autonomy of the American State Party Systems
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c19.95$d19.95$i0822955970$n0002802759$sactive
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n50512307
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n95053044
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n778766
029 1 $aAU@$b000012158428
029 1 $aGBVCP$b193722127
029 1 $aGEBAY$b2626659
029 1 $aHEBIS$b053470354
029 1 $aYDXCP$b778446
029 1 $aYDXCP$b778766
029 1 $aUKMGB$b007427346
994 $aZ0$bP4A
948 $hNO HOLDINGS IN P4A - 306 OTHER HOLDINGS