MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 04209cam 2200649Mi 4500
001 ocn316496391
003 OCoLC
005 20131025142412.0
008 090319e20030227dcu o f100 0 eng d
006 m o d f
007 cr |||||||||||
040 $aCOO$beng$cCOO$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO
019 $a68495924
035 $a(OCoLC)316496391$z(OCoLC)68495924
072 7 $a12$2edbsc
072 7 $a32$2edbsc
086 0 $aE 1.99:827104
245 00 $aDISPOSITION PATHS FOR ROCKY FLATS GLOVEBOXES$h[electronic resource] :$bEVALUATING OPTIONS.
260 $aWashington, D.C :$bUnited States. Dept. of Energy ;$aOak Ridge, Tenn. :$bDistributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy,$c2003.
300 $a6 pages.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $acomputer$bc$2rdamedia
338 $aonline resource$bcr$2rdacarrier
500 $aPublished through the Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information.
500 $a02/27/2003.
500 $aWaste Management 2003 Symposium, Tucson, AZ (US), 02/23/2003--02/27/2003.
500 $aLarsen, P.; Geimer, R.; Loveland, K.; Lobdell, D.
500 $aEnvirocare of Utah, Inc., 605 N 5600 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 (US).
520 3 $aThe Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC has the responsibility for closure activities at the Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site (RFETS). One of the challenges faced for closure is the disposition of radiologically contaminated gloveboxes. Evaluation of the disposition options for gloveboxes included a detailed analysis of available treatment capabilities, disposal facilities, and lifecycle costs. The Kaiser-Hill Company, LLC followed several processes in determining how the gloveboxes would be managed for disposition. Currently, multiple disposition paths have been chosen to accommodate the needs of the varying styles and conditions of the gloveboxes, meet the needs of the decommissioning team, and to best manage lifecycle costs. Several challenges associated with developing a disposition path that addresses both the radiological and RCRA concerns as well as offering the most cost-effective solution were encountered. These challenges included meeting the radiological waste acceptance criteria of available disposal facilities, making a RCRA determination, evaluating treatment options and costs, addressing void requirements associated with disposal, and identifying packaging and transportation options. The varying disposal facility requirements affected disposition choices. Facility conditions that impacted decisions included radiological and chemical waste acceptance criteria, physical requirements, and measurement for payment options. The facility requirements also impacted onsite activities including management strategies, decontamination activities, and life-cycle cost.
530 $aReport is also available in paper and microfiche from NTIS.
538 $aMode of access: World Wide Web.
650 4 $aChemical Wastes.
650 4 $aClosures.
650 4 $aDecommissioning.
650 4 $aDecontamination.
650 4 $aEvaluation.
650 4 $aGloveboxes.
650 4 $aLife-cycle Cost.
650 4 $aManagement.
650 4 $aPackaging.
650 4 $aWaste Management.
650 4 $aWastes.
650 7 $aManagement Of Radioactive Wastes, And Non-radioactive Wastes From Nuclear Facilities.$2edbsc
650 7 $aEnergy Conservation, Consumption, And Utilization.$2edbsc
700 1 $aLarsen, P.$4aut
700 1 $aGeimer, R.$4aut
700 1 $aLoveland, K.$4aut
700 1 $aLobdell, D.$4aut
710 2 $aKaiser-Hill Company.$4res
710 1 $aUnited States.$bDepartment of Energy.$4spn
710 1 $aUnited States.$bDepartment of Energy.$bOffice of Scientific and Technical Information.$4res
710 1 $aUnited States.$bDepartment of Energy.$bOffice of Scientific and Technical Information.$4dst
710 2 $aEnvirocare of Utah, Inc., 605 N 5600 W, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 (U.S.)$4res
856 40 $uhttp://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/827104-GMSQLT/native/$zConnect to full text.
029 1 $aDOX$b827104
994 $aZ0$bPMR
948 $hNO HOLDINGS IN PMR - 2 OTHER HOLDINGS