| Record ID | ia:philosophyforsci0000alex |
| Source | Internet Archive |
| Download MARC XML | https://archive.org/download/philosophyforsci0000alex/philosophyforsci0000alex_marc.xml |
| Download MARC binary | https://www.archive.org/download/philosophyforsci0000alex/philosophyforsci0000alex_meta.mrc |
LEADER: 01868cam 2200361 i 4500
001 9925383330401661
005 20190425104937.0
008 161104s2017 nyua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2016048538
020 $a9780199300518$q(hardcover$qalkaline paper)
020 $a0199300518$q(hardcover$qalkaline paper)
035 $a99980104512
035 $a(OCoLC)973921070
035 $a(OCoLC)ocn973921070
040 $aDLC$beng$erda$cDLC$dBTCTA$dYDX$dBDX$dOCLCO$dOCLCF$dYDX$dOCLCO$dQGQ$dGUA$dZEM$dL2U$dEQO$dOCLCQ$dRVA$dCRU$dCLE$dXII
042 $apcc
050 00 $aBF575.H27$bA44 2017
082 00 $a158$223
100 1 $aAlexandrova, Anna,$d1977-$eauthor.
245 12 $aA philosophy for the science of well-being /$cAnna Alexandrova.
264 1 $aNew York, NY :$bOxford University Press,$c[2017]
300 $axlv, 196 pages :$billustrations ;$c22 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 171-190) and index.
520 8 $aDo the new sciences of well-being provide knowledge that respects the nature of well-being? This text written from the perspective of philosophy of science articulates how this field can speak to well-being proper and can do so in a way that respects the demands of objectivity and measurement.
505 00 $gpt. I$tTools for philosophy --$g1.$tIs There a single concept of well-being? --$g2.$tIs there a single theory of well-being? --$g3.$tHow to build a theory: the case of child well-being --$gpt. II$tTools for science --$g4.$tCan the science of well-being be objective? --$g5.$tIs well-being measurable? --$g6.$tPsychometrics as theory avoidance.
650 0 $aWell-being.
650 0 $aHappiness.
650 0 $aQuality of life.
947 $hCIRCSTACKS$r31786103132251
980 $a99980104512