It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC record from Internet Archive

LEADER: 03674cam 2200589 a 4500
001 ocn667319312
003 OCoLC
005 20211009110532.0
008 100930s2010 gw a b 000 0 eng c
040 $aFNE$beng$cFNE$dYDXCP$dSINLB$dOSU$dCIA$dOCLCF$dOCLCO$dS3O$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dOCL$dAU@$dUKMGB$dUKUOY$dOCLCQ$dIL4J6$dOCLCO
015 $aGBB142831$2bnb
016 7 $a015783433$2Uk
019 $a653084906$a1166520277$a1166575166
020 $a9781934105108$q(pbk.)
020 $a1934105104$q(pbk.)
035 $a(OCoLC)667319312$z(OCoLC)653084906$z(OCoLC)1166520277$z(OCoLC)1166575166
042 $apcc
050 4 $aN66$b.W427 2010
082 04 $a709.05$222
245 00 $aWhat is contemporary art? /$c[editors, Julieta Aranda, Brian Kuan Wood, Anton Vidokle].
246 1 $iAt head of title:$aE-flux journal
260 $aBerlin ;$aNew York :$bSternberg Press,$c©2010.
300 $a216 pages :$billustrations ;$c18 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
500 $a"This book began as a two-part issue of e-flux journal"--Page 9.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
505 00 $tWhat is contemporary art? /$rJulieta Aranda, Brian Kuan Wood, Anton Vidokle --$tContemp(t)orary : eleven theses /$rCuauhtémoc Medina --$tComrades of time /$rBoris Groys --$tNow and elsewhere /$rRaqs Media Collective --$tManifestos for the future /$rHans Ulrich Obrist --$tNew species of spaces /$rHu Fang --$tTorture and remedy : the end of -isms and the beginning hegemony of the impure /$rJörg Heiser --$tTake the money and run? : can political and socio-critical art "survive"? /$rMartha Rosler --$tContemporary extracts /$rHal Foster --$tContemporaneity as points of connection /$rZdenka Badovinac --$tBack to contemporary : one contemporary ambition, many worlds /$rCarol Yinghua Lu --$tWhat is not contemporary art? : the view from Jena /$rDieter Roelstraete --$tStanding on the gates of hell, my services are found wanting /$rJan Verwoert.
520 $a"What is contemporary art? First, and most obviously: why is this question not asked? That is to say, why do we simply leave it to hover in the shadow of attempts at critical summation in the grand tradition of twentieth-century artistic movements? The contemporary delineates its border invisibly: no one is proud to be 'contemporary', and no one is ashamed. Indeed, the question of where artistic movements have gone seems embedded in this question, if only because the 'contemporary' has become a single hegemonic '-ism' that absorbs all proposals for others. When there is no longer any artistic movements, it seems that we are all working under the auspices of this singular -ism that is deliberately (and not literally) not one at all ..." -- book cover.
650 0 $aArt, Modern$y21st century$xPhilosophy.
650 0 $aArt, Modern$y20th century$xPhilosophy.
650 7 $aArt, Modern$xPhilosophy.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00816650
650 7 $aArt, Modern$y21st century$xPhilosophy.$2nli
650 7 $aArt, Modern$y20th century$xPhilosophy.$2nli
650 7 $aModern konst.$2sao
650 7 $aFilosofi.$2sao
648 7 $a1900-2099$2fast
648 7 $a1900-talet$2sao
648 7 $a2000-talet$2sao
700 1 $aAranda, Julieta.
700 1 $aWood, Brian Kuan.
700 1 $aVidokle, Anton.
730 0 $aE-flux.
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n3407203
029 1 $aAU@$b000046936807
029 1 $aNLGGC$b329728059
029 1 $aNZ1$b13470828
029 1 $aUNITY$b12446520X
029 1 $aUKMGB$b015783433
994 $aZ0$bP4A
948 $hNO HOLDINGS IN P4A - 132 OTHER HOLDINGS