Record ID | marc_binghamton_univ/bgm_openlib_final_10-15.mrc:486377781:1644 |
Source | Binghamton University |
Download Link | /show-records/marc_binghamton_univ/bgm_openlib_final_10-15.mrc:486377781:1644?format=raw |
LEADER: 01644cam 2200385 a 45x0
001 BIN01-001457090
005 20070816164505.0
008 011129s2001 maua b 000 0 eng d
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm48502965
040 $aDBI$cDBI$dIXA$dNBiSU
049 $aBNGG
090 $aH62.5.U5$bN3 no.8546
100 1 $aBlundell, Richard.
245 10 $aHas "in-work" benefit reform helped the labour market? /$cRichard Blundell, Hillary Hoynes.
246 3 $aHas "in work" benefit reform helped the labor market?
260 $aCambridge, MA. :$bNational Bureau of Economic Research,$cc2001.
300 $a34, [25] p. :$bill. ;$c22 cm.
490 1 $aNBER working paper series ;$vno. 8546
500 $a"October 2001."
500 $aJEL no. H2, I3, J2.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 30-33).
530 $aElectronic version available via the Internet at the NBER World Wide Web site.
506 $aElectronic access limited to Binghamton University faculty, staff and students for instructional and research purposes only.
650 0 $aLabor supply$zGreat Britain.
650 0 $aEarned income tax credit$zGreat Britain.
650 0 $aMeans tests$zGreat Britain.
690 $aBU only.
700 1 $aHoynes, Hilary Williamson.
710 2 $aNational Bureau of Economic Research.
830 0 $aWorking paper series (National Bureau of Economic Research)$vworking paper no. 8546.
856 41 $zOnline version:$uhttp://referenc.lib.binghamton.edu:2048/login?url=http://www.nber.org/papers/W8546
852 0 $aBIN$bBINMA$cMAIN$hH62.5.U5$iN3 no.8546
852 40 $aBIN$bBINEL$cBNET
994 $aX0$bBNG
928 $aTBA