MARC Record from marc_claremont_school_theology

LEADER: 02262cam a2200469 4500
001 ocm00026677
003 OCoLC
005 20200617073450.9
008 691021r19691898ne b 001 0 eng
010 $a 71419150
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dOCLCQ$dNLGGC$dBTCTA$dOCLCG$dGBVCP$dOCLCO$dOCLCA$dOCLCQ$dU3G$dOCLCQ$dOCLCA$dOCLCF$dPB4$dJ9U
015 $aNe69-16
019 $a633506839
029 1 $aAU@$b000000561788
029 1 $aGBVCP$b117413593
035 $a(OCoLC)00026677$z(OCoLC)633506839
050 00 $aBS2555.2$b.B57 1969
082 00 $a226/.04
084 $a11.32$2bcl
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aBlass, Friedrich,$d1843-1907.
245 10 $aPhilology of the gospels.$cBy Friedrich Blass.
260 $aAmsterdam,$bB.R. Grüner,$c1969.
300 $aviii, 252 pages$c23 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
500 $aReprint of the London, 1898 ed.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references.
505 0 $aSt. Luke's gospel distinctly a literary work -- The proem of St. Luke -- When did St. Luke write? -- Arguments for and against the early date of St. Luke's gospel -- Importance and method of textual criticism in the New Testament -- Textual condition of the gospels: Matthew, Luke -- The question of the double text in St. Luke's gospel and in the Acts -- The proofs for two distinct texts in the Acts -- The double text in St. Luke's gospel -- Some other textual difficulties in St. Luke's gospel -- Textual condition and original separate forms of Mark's gospel -- Textual condition of St. John's gospel.
590 $bArchive
630 00 $aBible.$pGospels$xCriticism, Textual.
630 07 $aBible.$pGospels.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01808065
630 04 $aNew Testament.$pGospels$xCriticism, Textual.
650 17 $aEvangeliën.$2gtt
650 17 $aTekstgeschiedenis.$2gtt
653 0 $aBible$aN.T$aGospels$aCriticism, Textual
655 7 $aCriticism, interpretation, etc.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01411635
776 08 $iOnline version:$aBlass, Friedrich, 1843-1907.$tPhilology of the gospels.$dAmsterdam, B.R. Grüner, 1969$w(OCoLC)894296228
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n71419150 //r902
994 $a92$bCST
976 $a10011316218