MARC Record from marc_claremont_school_theology

LEADER: 04009cam a2200649 a 4500
001 ocm33665109
003 OCoLC
005 20200617075351.2
008 951106s1996 nyu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 95047035
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dC#P$dCOX$dUKM$dEYM$dWSU$dGZM$dBAKER$dNLGGC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dOCLCG$dZWZ$dBDX$dOCLCO$dOCLCF$dOCLCQ$dUWO
015 $aGB9679280$2bnb
019 $a35830430$a35955702
020 $a0312159668$q(cloth)
020 $a9780312159665$q(cloth)
020 $a0333620658$q(cased)
020 $a9780333620656$q(cased)
029 1 $aAU@$b000012049977
029 1 $aHR0$b0333620658
029 1 $aNLGGC$b14307850X
029 1 $aNZ1$b4830312
029 1 $aZWZ$b024644404
035 $a(OCoLC)33665109$z(OCoLC)35830430$z(OCoLC)35955702
050 00 $aBL51$b.C3235 1996
082 00 $a200$220
084 $a11.02$2bcl
049 $aMAIN
245 00 $aCan religion be explained away? /$cedited by D.Z. Phillips.
260 $aNew York :$bSt. Martin's Press,$c1996.
300 $axvii, 290 pages ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aClaremont studies in the philosophy of religion
500 $a[Papers from the] "1995 Claremont Conference on the Philosophy of Religion"--Page ix.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $tIs animism alive and well? /$rRichard Eldridge --$tIs animism alive and well? A response to Professor Eldridge /$rMario von der Ruhr --$tIs religion a product of wishful thinking? /$rLars Hertzberg --$tProjection: a metaphor in search of a theory? /$rVan A. Harvey --$tPsychoanalysis as ultimate explanation /$rJohn Deigh --$tPsychoanalysis as ultimate explanation of religion /$rIlham Dilman --$tSources of the self's sense of itself: a theistic reading of modernity /$rStephen Mulhall --$tDoing justice or giving the devil his due /$rPeter Winch --$tIs religion the opium of the people? Marxianism and religion /$rKai Nielsen --$tIs religion the opium of the people? A reply to Kai Nielsen /$rDavid McLellan --$tDislocating the soul /$rD.Z. Phillips --$tImmortality without metaphysics: a reply to D.Z. Phillips /$rJohn Hyman --$tVoices in discussion /$rD.Z. Phillips.
520 $aAs the century draws to its close, how should we think of religion? Some see it as the survival in our midst of an outmoded, primitive way of thinking, while others accuse its critics of simply being blind to the meaning of religious belief. From a different perspective, the clash between belief and unbelief is not seen as a matter of identifying incoherent systems of thought, but as a clash between different demands made on us by divergent ways of looking at the world. Criticisms will flow between these perspectives. There is, however, another kind of interest in this situation: an interest in giving just characterizations of these different voices, so that the nature of allegiances and oppositions to religion may be better understood.
590 $bArchive
650 0 $aReligion$xPhilosophy.
650 0 $aReligion$vControversial literature.
650 7 $aReligion.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01093763
650 7 $aReligion$xPhilosophy.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01093794
650 17 $aGodsdienst.$2gtt
650 7 $aReligion$xPhilosophie.$2ram
650 7 $aReligion$xOuvrages de controverse.$2ram
653 0 $aReligion$aPhilosophy
655 7 $aControversial literature.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01423907
700 1 $aPhillips, D. Z.$q(Dewi Zephaniah)
711 2 $aClaremont Graduate School Philosophy of Religion Conference$d(1995 :$cClaremont McKenna College)
830 0 $aClaremont studies in the philosophy of religion.
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c65.00$d65.00$i0312159668$n0002788604$sactive
938 $aBrodart$bBROD$n49437240$c$59.95
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n95047035
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n100067874
994 $a92$bCST
976 $a10011444449