MARC Record from marc_claremont_school_theology

LEADER: 03805cam a2200673 i 4500
001 ocm03310304
003 OCoLC
005 20200617073147.7
008 770915s1978 miu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 77013851
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dNLGGC$dBTCTA$dOCLCG$dZID$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dOCLCF$dOCLCO$dCNUTO$dDHA$dUKOBU$dCEF$dCNO$dMUO$dFQG$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dOCLCQ$dNLUKB$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO
019 $a7963053$a1006484120$a1055421655
020 $a0802817122
020 $a9780802817129
029 1 $aAU@$b000001028210
029 1 $aHEBIS$b176433791
029 1 $aNLGGC$b785045929
029 1 $aNZ1$b2992432
029 1 $aNZ1$b54780
029 1 $aUNITY$b033568626
035 $a(OCoLC)03310304$z(OCoLC)7963053$z(OCoLC)1006484120$z(OCoLC)1055421655
050 00 $aBT98$b.E85
055 03 $aBT98$bE85
082 00 $a200/.1
084 $a11.02$2bcl
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aEvans, C. Stephen.
245 10 $aSubjectivity and religious belief :$ban historical, critical study /$cby C. Stephen Evans.
260 $aGrand Rapids :$bChristian University Press,$c©1978.
300 $axii, 225 pages ;$c21 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
505 0 $aIntroduction: subjective justifications of belief in God -- Kant: belief as a postulate of practical reason -- Kierkegaard: belief as existentially necessary -- James: belief as pragmatically justified -- Three thinkers: agreement and disagreement -- Conclusions: general features of a viable defense of religious belief -- Conclusions: subjective concerns as metaphysical data and subjective concern as the ground of personal faith.
520 $aImmanuel Kant, Soren Kierkegaard, and William James- three diverse philosophers from three different eras- have followed a similar route of non-theoretical justification of belief. This position states that there is no theoretical knowledge, positive or negative, of divine existence. The defense of religious belief, therefore, must be related to pervasive features of practical human existence; in other words, it must be subjective. While giving amble attention to the differences among these three philosophers, C. Stephen Evans finds and examines a common structure to all their arguments. This structure includes a theoretical skepticism about the existence of God, a repudiation of a neutral attitude on this question, and a deliberate shift of this question from theoretical reason to practical reason.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 215-221) and index.
590 $bArchive
600 10 $aKant, Immanuel,$d1724-1804$xReligion.
600 10 $aKierkegaard, Søren,$d1813-1855$xReligion.
600 10 $aJames, William,$d1842-1910$xReligion.
600 17 $aJames, William,$d1842-1910.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00029108
600 17 $aKant, Immanuel,$d1724-1804.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00031763
600 17 $aKierkegaard, Søren,$d1813-1855.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00037558
650 0 $aSubjectivity$xReligious aspects.
650 0 $aFaith.
650 0 $aTheology$xHistory.
650 0 $aFaith$xHistory of doctrines.
650 7 $aFaith.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01198492
650 7 $aFaith$xHistory of doctrines.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00919943
650 7 $aReligion.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01093763
650 7 $aSubjectivity$xReligious aspects.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01136571
650 7 $aTheology.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01149559
650 17 $aGeloof.$2gtt
650 17 $aSubjectiviteit.$2gtt
655 7 $aHistory.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01411628
776 08 $iOnline version:$aEvans, C. Stephen.$tSubjectivity and religious belief.$dGrand Rapids : Christian University Press, ©1978$w(OCoLC)568764077
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n77013851
994 $a92$bCST
976 $a10011336137