It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_claremont_school_theology

Record ID marc_claremont_school_theology/CSTMARC2_barcode.mrc:32069228:5863
Source marc_claremont_school_theology
Download Link /show-records/marc_claremont_school_theology/CSTMARC2_barcode.mrc:32069228:5863?format=raw

LEADER: 05863cam a2200721 a 4500
001 ocm52387902
003 OCoLC
005 20200617073602.8
008 030430s2003 enk b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2003051868
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dBAKER$dSAC$dUWC$dBTCTA$dYDXCP$dOCLCG$dSTF$dOCLCQ$dGEBAY$dA7U$dDEBBG$dOCLCQ$dOCLCF$dOCLCO$dOCLCA$dOCLCQ$dOCLCO$dTKF$dMQ9$dLRP$dOCLCO$dLND$dOCLCQ$dCSA$dDHA$dOCLCQ$dCPO$dOCLCQ$dOCLCA$dUKBTH
019 $a53249269
020 $a0195148940$q(cloth)
020 $a9780195148947$q(cloth)
020 $a0195148959$q(pbk.)
020 $a9780195148954$q(pbk.)
029 1 $aAU@$b000024707642
029 1 $aDEBBG$bBV017231247
029 1 $aGEBAY$b7176711
029 1 $aYDXCP$b2004681
029 1 $aYDXCP$b2004684
035 $a(OCoLC)52387902$z(OCoLC)53249269
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aKF4755.5$b.A95 2003
080 $a301.173
082 00 $a342.73/087$221
084 $aMS 3450$2rvk
084 $aPL 732$2rvk
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aCohen, Carl,$d1931-
245 10 $aAffirmative action and racial preference :$ba debate /$cCarl Cohen, James P. Sterba.
260 $aOxford [England] ;$aNew York :$bOxford University Press,$c2003.
300 $axv, 394 pages ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aPoint/counterpoint series
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 365-370) and index.
505 0 $aSection One: Why race preference is wrong and bad / Carl Cohen -- Prologue: Wrongness and badness -- pt. 1. Equality and race preference -- 1. Equality as a moral ideal -- 2. Affirmative action -- 3. Race preference: the transformation of affirmative action -- pt. 2. Why race preference is wrong -- 4. Race preference is morally wrong -- 5. Race preference is against the law -- 6. Race preference violates the Constitution -- pt. 3. Why race preference is bad -- 7. Race preference is bad for the minorities preferred -- 8. Race preference is bad for the universities that give preference -- 9. Race preference is bad for society as a whole -- Epilogue: The future of race preference -- Section Two: Defending affirmative action, defending preferences / James P. Sterba -- 1. A legal history of affirmative action in the United States -- 2. A definition of affirmative action -- 3. A defense of outreach affirmative action -- 4. A defense of remedial affirmative action -- 5. Remedial affirmative action and the U.S. Supreme Court -- 6. Racial discrimination v. sexual discrimination -- 7. A better standard of proof for remedial affirmative action -- 8. A defense of diversity affirmative action -- 9. Objections to affirmative action -- 10. Affirmative action outside the United States -- Conclusion -- Section Three: Reply to James P. Sterba / Carl Cohen -- Section Four: Reply to Carl Cohen / James P. Sterba -- Section Five: Comments on the Supreme Court decision / Carl Cohen and James P. Sterba.
520 1 $a"Carl Cohen, a key figure in the University of Michigan Supreme Court cases, argues that racial preferences are morally wrong - forbidden by the 14[superscript th] Amendment to the Constitution, and explicitly banned by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. He also contends that such preferences harm society in general, damage the universities that use them, and undermine the minorities they were intended to serve. James P. Sterba counters that, far from being banned by the Constitution and the civil rights acts, affirmative action is actually mandated by law in the pursuit of a society that is racially and sexually just. The same Congress that adopted the 14[superscript th] Amendment, he notes, passed race-specific laws that extended aid to blacks. Indeed, there are various kinds of affirmative action - compensation for past discrimination, remedial measures aimed at current discrimination, the guarantee of diversity - and Sterba reviews the Supreme Court cases that build a constitutional foundation for each. Affirmative action, he argues, favors qualified minority candidates, not unqualified ones. Both authors offer concluding comment on the University of Michigan cases decided by the Supreme Court in June 2003"--Jacket.
590 $bArchive
650 0 $aAffirmative action programs$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States.
650 7 $aAffirmative action programs$xLaw and legislation.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00798907
651 7 $aUnited States.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01204155
650 7 $aEthnische Beziehungen$2gnd
650 7 $aQuotierung$2gnd
650 7 $aAffirmative action programs$zUnited States$xLaw and legislation.$2sears
651 7 $aUSA.$2swd
700 1 $aSterba, James P.
830 0 $aPoint/counterpoint series (Oxford, England)
856 41 $3ebrary$uhttp://site.ebrary.com/id/10085272
856 41 $3Table of contents$uhttp://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&doc_number=010383953&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
856 41 $3Table of contents$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0614/2003051868-t.html
856 41 $uhttp://catalogue.londonmet.ac.uk/record=b1682332~S1$zE-book
856 41 $uhttp://0-lib.myilibrary.com.emu.londonmet.ac.uk/browse/open.asp?ID=134686$zE-book - Full text from MyiLibrary
856 42 $3Contributor biographical information$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0723/2003051868-b.html
856 42 $3Publisher description$uhttp://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0614/2003051868-d.html
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c30.00$d22.50$i0195148940$n0004240187$sactive
938 $aBaker & Taylor$bBKTY$c24.95$d24.95$i0195148959$n0004253890$sactive
938 $aBaker and Taylor$bBTCP$n2003051868
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n2004684
994 $a92$bCST
976 $a10017003969