MARC Record from marc_claremont_school_theology

LEADER: 03599cam a2200493 a 4500
001 ocn663459386
003 OCoLC
005 20200617075441.8
008 100903s2010 oru b 001 0 eng
010 $a 2010037451
040 $aDLC$beng$cDLC$dCDX$dTSM$dYDXCP$dUKMGB$dALAUL$dOCLCA$dNNG$dOCLCF$dRCT$dOCLCQ$dOCLCA
015 $aGBB1A8956$2bnb
016 7 $a015890594$2Uk
020 $a9781598150209$q(alk. paper)
020 $a1598150200$q(alk. paper)
029 1 $aAU@$b000046019148
029 1 $aUKMGB$b015890594
035 $a(OCoLC)663459386
050 00 $aBT482$b.S36 2010
082 00 $a236/.8$222
049 $aMAIN
100 1 $aScott, Bernard Brandon,$d1941-
245 14 $aThe trouble with resurrection :$bfrom Paul to the Fourth Gospel /$cBernard Brandon Scott.
260 $aSalem, Or. :$bPolebridge Press,$c©2010.
300 $axi, 251 pages ;$c23 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$bnc$2rdacarrier
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $tIntroduction: the problem with resurrection ---- 1. The first reference --- 2. After death in ancient Israel --- 3. Awakening from the dead --- 4. The dead in the anointed will rise first --- 5. An experience of Jesus raised from the dead --- 6. The earliest resurrection narrative? --- 7. The list --- 8. He has been seen --- 9. With what kind of body? --- 10. Assumption --- 11. Empty tomb --- 12. Mathew and Lukeʹs take on Mark --- 13. The empty tomb, again --- 14. Mary Magdalene, first? --- 15. What happened? ---- Postscript: reclaiming resurrection.
520 $aThe term "resurrection" has come to stand for what Christianity is all about. But a close look reveals that it should not be understood monolithically, but rather as a pluralistic and diverse phenomenon. Early Christian communities were convinced that Rome had not defeated Jesus when they crucified him. They employed a whole host of metaphors to express that conviction. The use of the single term "resurrection" to cover the phenomenon is a mistake-one that has tyrannized Christianity. Furthermore, most Christians believe in a physical resurrection, although Paul clearly calls this into question. Once that tradition became fixed, it provided the lens through which everything else was viewed-and distorted. The purpose of this book is not to say whether Jesus arose from the grave on the third day, or whether such an event is impossible. Rather, by examining the so-called resurrection stories in chronological order, it aspires to prompt readers to consider questions such as: a- what does the New Testament really say about the resurrection; b- what is the influence of Judaism on Christian belief in the resurrection; c- how did the resurrection become the central belief in Christianity; d- why did early Christians choose to believe in the resurrection; and e- and why is resurrection not the right word.
590 $bArchive
600 00 $aJesus Christ$xResurrection.
630 00 $aBible.$pNew Testament$xCriticism, interpretation, etc.
600 07 $aJesus Christ.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst00040116
630 07 $aBible.$pNew Testament.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01808090
650 0 $aResurrection.
650 7 $aResurrection.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01096044
650 7 $aResurrection of Jesus Christ.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01354440
655 7 $aCriticism, interpretation, etc.$2fast$0(OCoLC)fst01411635
938 $aCoutts Information Services$bCOUT$n15030168
938 $aYBP Library Services$bYANK$n3648362
994 $a92$bCST
976 $a10017025996