| Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-003.mrc:298403842:3160 |
| Source | marc_columbia |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-003.mrc:298403842:3160?format=raw |
LEADER: 03160cam a2200337 a 4500
001 1350271
005 20220602013712.0
008 930409s1993 txu b 000 0 eng
010 $a 93060371
020 $a0883128225
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm28627156
035 $9AHJ6487CU
035 $a(NNC)1350271
035 $a1350271
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dOrLoB-B
050 00 $aPC2301$b.R36 1993
082 00 $a445$220
100 1 $aRand, Sharon Rebecca,$d1960-$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no93022940
245 14 $aThe French imparfait and passé simple in discourse /$cSharon Rebecca Rand.
260 $a[Dallas] :$bSummer Institute of Linguistics ; [Arlington] : University of Texas at Arlington,$c1993.
300 $axi, 136 pages ;$c23 cm.
336 $atext$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$2rdamedia
338 $avolume$2rdacarrier
490 1 $aSummer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington publications in linguistics,$x1040-0850 ;$vpublication 116
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 133-136).
505 20 $g1.$tThe Imparfait and the Passe Simple: Different Approaches.$g1.1.$tGrammaire Larousse.$g1.2.$tGrevisse.$g1.3.$tImbs.$g1.4.$tAbrate.$g1.5.$tCox.$g1.6.$tComrie.$g1.7.$tStrong focus versus weak focus.$g1.8.$tForegrounding versus backgrounding --$g2.$tBoundedness and Nonboundedness.$g2.1.$tA core semantic value for the imparfait.$g2.2.$tBoundedness and nonboundedness as core traits.$g2.3.$tBoundedness and Grobe's restricted/nonrestricted opposition.$g2.4.$tA definition of boundedness.$g2.5.$tBoundedness and Abrate's emphasis model.$g2.6.$tBoundedness and discourse approaches --$g3.$tEvent and State Concepts.$g3.2.$tPoints of reference: Objective and subjective.$g3.3.$tLevel one: Phenomena.$g3.4.$tLevel two: Perception.$g3.5.$tLevel three: Communication.$g3.6.$tEvent and state as metaphor --$g4.$tEvent and State in Relation to Verb Types.$g4.1.$tVendler's four verb types.$g4.2.$tKenny's three verb types.$g4.3.$tGarey: Telic versus atelic verb types.$g4.4.$tComrie's situation types.
505 80 $g4.5.$tMourelatos' situation categories.$g4.6.$tMourelatos' aspectual distinctions applied to French --$g5.$tEvent and State in Different Uses of the Imparfait and Passe Simple.$g5.1.$tCategories of examples.$g5.2.$tCircumstance or description.$g5.3.$tImparfait-passe simple: Classical opposition.$g5.4.$tDuration.$g5.5.$tBackground.$g5.6.$tCommentary.$g5.7.$tPerspective or indirect style.$g5.8.$tPicturesque, historical, or narrative.$g5.9.$tClosing or opening.$g5.10.$tHabitual.$g5.11.$tProgression.$g5.12.$tNonstative verbs.$g5.13.$tStative verbs --$g6.$tEvent and State in a French Narrative Text.$g6.1.$tInitial chunking of "L'huissier"$g6.8.$tSurface structure findings.$g6.9.$tTension level and peak markings.$g6.10.$tStage or setting and climactic sections.
650 0 $aFrench language$xTense.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008121234
830 0 $aSummer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington publications in linguistics ;$vpublication 116.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n88506350
852 00 $bglx$hPC2301$i.R36 1993