It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-004.mrc:183327308:3935
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-004.mrc:183327308:3935?format=raw

LEADER: 03935fam a2200457 a 4500
001 1642555
005 20220608203407.0
008 940628t19941994mau b 001 0 eng
010 $a 94027466
020 $a0262111950 (c) :$c$30.00
035 $a(OCoLC)30811386
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm30811386
035 $9AKQ3322CU
035 $a(NNC)1642555
035 $a1642555
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dNNC$dOrLoB
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aHE8689.8$b.K73 1995
082 00 $a384.55/1$220
100 1 $aKrattenmaker, Thomas G.,$d1943-$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n94021214
245 10 $aRegulating broadcast programming /$cThomas G. Krattenmaker, Lucas A. Powe, Jr.
260 $aCambridge, Mass. :$bMIT Press ;$aWashington, D.C. :$bAEI Press,$c[1994], ©1994.
263 $a9501
300 $axiv, 369 pages ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
490 1 $aAEI studies in telecommunications deregulation
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 333-348) and indexes.
505 0 $a1. Introduction -- 2. The Regulatory Scheme Created. The Radio Act of 1912. Herbert Hoover and the Early Growth of Radio. The Rise and Fall of Hoover's Policies. The Radio Act of 1927. The Federal Radio Commission. The Commission and the Courts -- 3. Market Failure. Framework for Defining the "Public Interest" Potential Sources of Market Failure. The Limits of Competition. Broadcasters' Special Access to a Unique Resource -- 4. Diversity. Minimum Diversity Levels. Diversifying Program Mix. Outlet and Source Diversity -- 5. Conformity. Sex. Drugs. Violence. Advertising -- 6. The Public Interest. The Malleable Public Interest. The Creation of the Public Trustee Image -- 7. Broadcasting and the Supreme Court. The Early Cases. The NBC Case. The Red Lion Case. The League of Women Voters Case. The Pacifica Case -- 8. Broadcasting Versus Print. Scarcity. Intrusion. Power. Public Property. Equality Without a Difference -- 9. The Fairness Doctrine. Costs, Benefits, Effects, and Alternatives.
505 8 $aDoctrinal Incoherence -- 10. Regulatory Failure. Markets. Competition. Technology -- 11. Reinventing Broadcast Regulation. Television's Critics. The Problems for the Critics. The Appropriate Scope of Regulation.
520 $aThe American Enterprise Institute's Studies in Telecommunications Deregulation present new research on telecommunications policy, with particular emphasis on reforms of federal and state regulatory policies that will advance rather than inhibit innovation and consumer welfare.
520 8 $aAEI has commissioned more than twenty-five distinguished experts in law, economics, and engineering to write monographs on regulatory issues in telephony, cable television, broadcasting, information services, and other communications technologies.
520 8 $aThe monographs are written and edited to be immediately useful to legislators, jurists, and public officials at all levels of government - as well as to business executives and consumers, who must live with these policies. As such, the monographs will also find a place in courses on regulated industries and communications policy in economics and communications departments and in business, law, and public policy schools.
650 0 $aBroadcasting policy$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2009117639
650 0 $aRadio broadcasting$xDeregulation$zUnited States.
650 0 $aTelevision broadcasting$xDeregulation$zUnited States.
650 0 $aFairness doctrine (Broadcasting)$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008120153
650 0 $aBroadcasting$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2007102164
700 1 $aPowe, L. A.
830 0 $aAEI studies in telecommunications deregulation.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n93064869
852 00 $bleh$hHE8689.8$i.K73 1995