It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-004.mrc:227130069:2364
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-004.mrc:227130069:2364?format=raw

LEADER: 02364mam a2200349 a 4500
001 1678654
005 20220608211345.0
008 940617t19951995nyu b s001 0 eng
010 $a 94003613
020 $a0791424677 (alk. paper)
020 $a0791424685 (pbk. : alk. paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm30739447
035 $9AKU5829CU
035 $a1678654
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dOrLoB
050 00 $aB105.M4$bG73 1995
082 00 $a121/.68$220
100 1 $aGracia, Jorge J. E.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n82119690
245 12 $aA theory of textuality :$bthe logic and epistemology /$cJorge J.E. García.
260 $aAlbany :$bState University of New York Press,$c[1995], ©1995.
300 $axxviii, 309 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p.[269]-299) and indexes.
520 $aThis is the first comprehensive and systematic theory of textuality that takes into account the relevant views of both analytic and Continental thinkers and also of major historical figures.
520 8 $aThe author shows that most of the confusion surrounding textuality is the result of three factors: a too-narrow understanding of the category; a lack of a proper distinction among logical, epistemological, and metaphysical issues; and a lack of proper grounding of epistemological and metaphysical questions on logic analyses.
520 8 $aThe author begins with a logical analysis of the notion of text resulting in a definition that serves as the basis for the distinctions he subsequently draws between texts on the one hand and language, artifacts, and art objects on the other; and for the classification of texts according to their modality and function.
520 8 $aThe second part of the book uses the conclusions of the first part to solve the various epistemological issues which have been raised about texts by philosophers of language, semioticians, hermeneuticists, literary critics, semanticists, aestheticians, and historiographers.
650 0 $aMeaning (Philosophy)$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85082692
650 0 $aCriticism (Philosophy)$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85034153
650 0 $aTheory (Philosophy)$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85134713
852 00 $boff,glx$hB105.M4$iG73 1995