| Record ID | marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-004.mrc:345518144:3075 |
| Source | marc_columbia |
| Download Link | /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-004.mrc:345518144:3075?format=raw |
LEADER: 03075mam a2200409 a 4500
001 1764223
005 20220608230905.0
008 951030t19961996ksua b 001 0 eng
010 $a 95046677
020 $a0700607706 (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a0700607714 (pbk. : alk. paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm33438834
035 $9ALH7578CU
035 $a(NNC)1764223
035 $a1764223
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dC#P$dOrLoB-B
043 $an-us---
050 00 $aHN90.C6$bN477 1996
082 00 $a307.1/4/0973$220
245 00 $aNew goverance for rural America :$bcreating intergovernmental partnerships /$cBeryl A. Radin [and others].
260 $aLawrence, Kan. :$bUniversity of Kansas Press,$c[1996], ©1996.
300 $axiii, 242 pages :$billustrations ;$c24 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
490 1 $aRural America
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $g1.$tIntergovernmental Relationships: Tensions and the Search for Solutions --$g2.$tThe Rural Development Policy Issue: Challenges Facing Rural America --$g3.$tThe Case Study States: A Study in Diversity --$g4.$tThe National Rural Development Partnership: A New Approach to Intergovernmental Relations --$g5.$tNew Governance in Action: Rural Development Councils as Networks --$g6.$tIntergovernmental Partnership Activities --$g7.$tExpectations and Outcomes.
520 $aThroughout the 1990s public demand for a fundamental shift in the relationship between government and its citizens has intensified. In response, a "new governance" model has emerged, emphasizing decreased federal control in favor of intergovernmental collaboration and increased involvement of state, local, and private agencies.
520 8 $aOne of the best examples of new governance can be found in the National and State Rural Development Councils (NRDC and SRDC), created in 1990 as the result of President Bush's Rural Development Initiative and called the Rural Development Partnership in the Clinton administration.
520 8 $aIn this first detailed analysis of the NRDCs and SRDCs, the authors examine the successes and failures of the original eight councils in Kansas, Maine, Mississippi, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, and Washington, as well as eight other councils subsequently created in Iowa, New Mexico, North Carolina, Vermont, New York, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.
610 20 $aNational Rural Development Partnership (U.S.)$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no95037992
650 0 $aRural development$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008110701
650 0 $aState-local relations$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2010114626
650 0 $aFederal government$zUnited States.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008000835
700 1 $aRadin, Beryl A.,$d1936-$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n50052438
830 0 $aRural America (Lawrence, Kan.)$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n92008335
852 00 $bleh$hHN90.C6$iN477 1996