It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-004.mrc:455826236:2609
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-004.mrc:455826236:2609?format=raw

LEADER: 02609fam a2200397 a 4500
001 1855388
005 20220609012001.0
008 950726s1996 nyu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 95032041
020 $a0195103440 (alk. paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)33013966
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm33013966
035 $9ALU1570CU
035 $a(NNC)1855388
035 $a1855388
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dNNC$dOrLoB-B
050 00 $aB1898.S68$bS55 1996
082 00 $a128/.1/092$220
100 1 $aSchmaltz, Tad M.,$d1960-$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n95074198
245 10 $aMalebranche's theory of the soul :$ba Cartesian interpretation /$cTad M. Schmaltz.
260 $aNew York, NY :$bOxford University Press,$c1996.
300 $axi, 308 pages ;$c24 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
505 00 $g1.$tThe Cogito --$g2.$tSensation --$g3.$tPure Perception --$g4.$tSpirituality --$g5.$tImmortality --$g6.$tFreedom.
520 $aWhen French philosopher Nicolas Malebranche (1638-1715) set forth his opposition to Descartes' view that mind is better known than body, he touched off a controversy that had prominent fellow Cartesians accusing him of both failed logic and dubious theology.
520 8 $aMalebranche responded by asserting that his negative thesis concerning our knowledge of mind derived from his superior grasp of Cartesian theory and signalled neither a rejection of Descartes' philosophical system nor a denial of properties of the soul such as spirituality, immortality, and freedom.
520 8 $aThe current resurgence of interest in Malebranche's work has led to a greater understanding of his account of ideas, his notorious doctrine of "the Vision of all things in God," but has left unexplored crucial aspects of his theory of the soul and the precise nature of its Cartesianism.
520 8 $aThis vital new book confronts these matters directly, arguing provocatively that Malebranche was correct in claiming a Cartesian foundation for his theory and demonstrating the value to Cartesian studies of Malebranche's uniquely internal critique of Descartes' account of body and mind.
600 10 $aMalebranche, Nicolas,$d1638-1715.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79133702
650 0 $aDoctrine of the soul.
650 0 $aSoul.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85125350
650 0 $aPhilosophy of mind.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh89004340
600 10 $aDescartes, René,$d1596-1650$xInfluence.
852 00 $boff,glx$hB1898.S68$iS55 1996