It looks like you're offline.
Open Library logo
additional options menu

MARC Record from marc_columbia

Record ID marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-004.mrc:463377410:2607
Source marc_columbia
Download Link /show-records/marc_columbia/Columbia-extract-20221130-004.mrc:463377410:2607?format=raw

LEADER: 02607pam a2200409 a 4500
001 1861180
005 20220609012740.0
008 960325s1996 ilu b 001 0 eng
010 $a 96013196
020 $a0226750205 (cloth : alk. paper)
020 $a0226750213 (pbk. : alk. paper)
035 $a(OCoLC)34548543
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm34548543
035 $9ALU9227CU
035 $a(NNC)1861180
035 $a1861180
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dDLC$dOrLoB-B
050 00 $aQ125$b.S5166 1996
082 00 $a509$220
100 1 $aShapin, Steven.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n78069419
245 14 $aThe scientific revolution /$cSteven Shapin.
260 $aChicago, IL :$bUniversity of Chicago Press,$c1996.
300 $axiv, 218 pages ;$c22 cm
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 $aRejecting the notion that there is anything like an "essence" of early modern science, Shapin emphasizes the social practices by which scientific knowledge was produced and the social purposes for which it was intended. He shows how the conduct of science emerged from a wide array of early modern philosophical agendas, political commitments, and religious beliefs. And he treats science not as a set of disembodied ideas, but as historically situated ways of knowing and doing.
520 8 $aShapin argues against traditional views that represent the Scientific Revolution as a coherent, cataclysmic, and once-and-for-all event. Every tendency that has customarily been identified as its modernizing essence was contested by sixteenth- and seventeenth-century practitioners with equal claims to modernity.
520 8 $aExperimentalism was both advocated and rejected; mathematical methods were both celebrated and treated with skepticism; mechanical conceptions of nature were seen both as defining proper science and as limited in their intelligibility and application; and the role of experience in making scientific knowledge was treated in radically different ways.
520 8 $aYet Shapin points to the many ways that contested legacy is nevertheless rightly understood as the origin of modern science, its problems as well as its acknowledged achievements.
650 0 $aScience$xHistory.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85118570
852 00 $bsci$hQ125$i.S5166 1996
852 00 $bbar$hQ125$i.S5166 1996
852 00 $bbar$hQ125$i.S5166 1996
852 00 $bbar$hQ125$i.S5166 1996
852 00 $bbar$hQ125$i.S5166 1996
852 00 $bbar,fli$kFLI PARTNER$hQ125$i.S5166 1996