MARC Record from marc_columbia

LEADER: 03411mam a2200397 a 4500
001 1983743
005 20220609043032.0
008 961203s1997 enka b 001 0 eng
010 $a 96052314
020 $a0198292252
035 $a(OCoLC)ocm36066105
035 $9AMK3063CU
035 $a(NNC)1983743
035 $a1983743
040 $aDLC$cDLC$dC#P$dOrLoB-B
050 00 $aJC571$b.F637 1997
082 00 $a322.4/4/098$221
100 1 $aFoweraker, Joe.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n81001233
245 10 $aCitizenship rights and social movements :$ba comparative and statistical analysis /$cJoe Foweraker and Todd Landman.
260 $aOxford ;$aNew York :$bOxford University Press,$c1997.
300 $axxvii, 296 pages :$billustrations ;$c25 cm.
336 $atext$btxt$2rdacontent
337 $aunmediated$bn$2rdamedia
490 1 $aOxford studies in democratization
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [263]-291) and index.
505 00 $tVariables Used in the Statistical Analysis --$tIntroduction: Citizenship Rights and Social Movements --$g1.$tCitizenship, Collective Action, and the State --$g2.$tIndividual Rights, Social Movements, and Waves of Protest --$g3.$tMethods and Sources --$g4.$tThe Contours of Citizenship Rights --$g5.$tThe Contours of Social Movements --$g6.$tRelating Citizenship Rights and Social Movements over Time --$g7.$tRelating Citizenship Rights and Social Movement through Time --$g8.$tSocial Movements, Individual Rights, and Democratic Transitions --$gApp. A.$tCase Synopses and Chronologies --$gApp. B.$tBanks Legal Institutional Index (BANKSLII) Components --$gApp. C.$tBoolean Results.
520 $aThis is the first comparative study of the relationship between social movements and citizenship rights. It identifies the main connections made between collective action and individual rights, in theory and history, and tests them in the context of modern authoritarian regimes. It does so by measuring both social mobilization and the presence of rights over time, and by analysing their mutual impact statistically - both within and across national cases.
520 8 $aThe results create a new perspective on democratic struggles in authoritarian conditions, and on processes of democratic transition. The argument is mainly developed through reference to periods of authoritarian rule in Brazil, Chile, Mexico, and Spain. Measuring mobilization and rights provides a comparative description of their forms and fluctuations, just as the statistical results promote a comparative analysis of their influence and interactions.
520 8 $aThe study uses statistical techniques, but employs them to illuminate historical processes. In sum, its quantitative methods work to enhance the qualitative inquiry, and together they come to constitute a robust defence of democracy as the direct result of collective struggles for individual rights.
650 0 $aCivil rights$vCase studies.
650 0 $aHuman rights$vCase studies.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2009126623
650 0 $aDemocracy$vCase studies.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008102148
650 0 $aSocial movements$vCase studies.
700 1 $aLandman, Todd.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n96117130
830 0 $aOxford studies in democratization.$0http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n95100381
852 00 $bleh$hJC571$i.F637 1997